* 2.6.9 slows down everything
@ 2004-12-06 13:50 Jan Panteltje
2004-12-06 14:00 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2004-12-06 20:01 ` William Lee Irwin III
0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Jan Panteltje @ 2004-12-06 13:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel
Slow slow slow, compile takes looooong time..../
even with all modules removed.
Even the mouse becomes sluggy
top shops no excessive CPU usage.
I am back to 2.4.25,
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.6.9 slows down everything
2004-12-06 13:50 2.6.9 slows down everything Jan Panteltje
@ 2004-12-06 14:00 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2004-12-06 20:01 ` William Lee Irwin III
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz @ 2004-12-06 14:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jan Panteltje; +Cc: linux-kernel
On Mon, 06 Dec 2004 14:50:50 +0100, Jan Panteltje <panteltje@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Slow slow slow, compile takes looooong time..../
> even with all modules removed.
> Even the mouse becomes sluggy
> top shops no excessive CPU usage.
> I am back to 2.4.25,
OK... and what is the point of your post?
If you want to report bugs please read REPORTING-BUGS first.
Thanks.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.6.9 slows down everything
2004-12-06 13:50 2.6.9 slows down everything Jan Panteltje
2004-12-06 14:00 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
@ 2004-12-06 20:01 ` William Lee Irwin III
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: William Lee Irwin III @ 2004-12-06 20:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jan Panteltje; +Cc: linux-kernel, davej
On Mon, Dec 06, 2004 at 02:50:50PM +0100, Jan Panteltje wrote:
> Slow slow slow, compile takes looooong time..../
> even with all modules removed.
> Even the mouse becomes sluggy
> top shops no excessive CPU usage.
> I am back to 2.4.25,
I've heard of several MTRR issues with 2.6.x, of which this is likely
an instance.
The pattern seemed to involve attempts to cover the final portion of
RAM with numerous fragments decreasing in size with ascending
physical address, and failure to cover the final 4-8MB RAM. Odder
still, the affected systems seemed to only have 1GB RAM, and for some
reason 2.4.x was not affected.
I've walked about 3 or 4 users through manually correcting the MTRR
settings over the past 2 weeks.
-- wli
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2004-12-06 20:01 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2004-12-06 13:50 2.6.9 slows down everything Jan Panteltje
2004-12-06 14:00 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2004-12-06 20:01 ` William Lee Irwin III
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox