From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261713AbULGAU2 (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Dec 2004 19:20:28 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261709AbULGAU2 (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Dec 2004 19:20:28 -0500 Received: from quickstop.soohrt.org ([81.2.155.147]:1480 "EHLO quickstop.soohrt.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261713AbULGAUR (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Dec 2004 19:20:17 -0500 Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2004 01:20:12 +0100 From: Karsten Desler To: Bernd Eckenfels Cc: "David S. Miller" , netdev@oss.sgi.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: _High_ CPU usage while routing (mostly) small UDP packets Message-ID: <20041207002012.GB30674@quickstop.soohrt.org> References: <20041206224107.GA8529@soohrt.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040722i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Bernd Eckenfels wrote: > In article <20041206224107.GA8529@soohrt.org> you wrote: > > Removing the iptables rules helps reducing the load a little, but the > > majority of time is still spent somewhere else. > > In handling Interrupts. Are those equally sidtributed on eth0 and eth1? Yes they are. Thanks, Karsten CPU0 CPU1 0: 117199776 133677244 IO-APIC-edge timer 1: 0 9 IO-APIC-edge i8042 8: 0 4 IO-APIC-edge rtc 9: 0 0 IO-APIC-level acpi 169: 139 893669684 IO-APIC-level eth0 177: 919803109 30665 IO-APIC-level eth1 209: 414257 413316 IO-APIC-level libata NMI: 0 0 LOC: 250918849 250918819 ERR: 0 MIS: 0