From: David Brownell <david-b@pacbell.net>
To: linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Cc: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [linux-usb-devel] [RFC PATCH] debugfs - yet another in-kernel file system
Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2004 17:29:01 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200412101729.01155.david-b@pacbell.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20041210005055.GA17822@kroah.com>
On Thursday 09 December 2004 4:50 pm, Greg KH wrote:
> What if there was a in-kernel filesystem that was explicitly just for
> putting debugging stuff? Some place other than proc and sysfs, and that
> was easier than both of them to use. Yet it needed to also be able to
> handle complex stuff like seq file and raw file_ops if needed.
The problem with sysfs here is: no seq_file support.
Otherwise it solves the basic "where to put the debug
files associated with "device X" or "driver Y" problems
in a good non-confusing way: there are directories
already set up for devices and for drivers.
The problem with procfs here is that it doesn't have
such a naming solution: there's no automatic mapping
betwen a /proc/driver/...file and its device, or vice
versa. That issue is shared with debugfs.
Couldn't debugfs just be a thin shim on top of sysfs,
adding seq_file support? Or on top of procfs, adding
device/driver naming domains, and maybe file-per-value
read/write support for drivers that want them?
What I'd really want out of a debug file API is to resolve
the naming issues, work with seq_file, and "softly and
silently vanish away". I think this patch has the last
two, but not the first one!
- Dave
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-12-11 1:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-12-10 0:50 [RFC PATCH] debugfs - yet another in-kernel file system Greg KH
2004-12-10 0:55 ` [RFC PATCH] convert uhci-hcd to use debugfs Greg KH
2004-12-10 14:15 ` Josh Boyer
2004-12-10 15:27 ` Greg KH
2004-12-10 16:21 ` Josh Boyer
2004-12-10 17:17 ` Comments on new kernel dev. model Peter Karlsson
2004-12-10 23:44 ` Greg KH
2004-12-10 7:07 ` [RFC PATCH] debugfs - yet another in-kernel file system Jan Engelhardt
2004-12-10 7:54 ` Greg KH
2004-12-10 8:00 ` Jan Engelhardt
2004-12-10 16:02 ` Greg KH
2004-12-10 14:46 ` Josh Boyer
2004-12-10 15:30 ` Greg KH
2004-12-10 16:26 ` Josh Boyer
2004-12-10 17:21 ` Jörn Engel
2004-12-10 17:35 ` Greg KH
2004-12-10 18:29 ` Jörn Engel
2004-12-10 19:38 ` Roland Dreier
2004-12-11 1:29 ` David Brownell [this message]
2004-12-11 1:39 ` [linux-usb-devel] " Greg KH
2004-12-11 2:02 ` David Brownell
2004-12-11 2:05 ` Greg KH
2004-12-11 2:26 ` Roland Dreier
2004-12-11 2:32 ` Greg KH
2004-12-11 13:23 ` Roland Dreier
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200412101729.01155.david-b@pacbell.net \
--to=david-b@pacbell.net \
--cc=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox