public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Mark_H_Johnson@raytheon.com
Cc: Amit Shah <amit.shah@codito.com>,
	Karsten Wiese <annabellesgarden@yahoo.de>,
	Bill Huey <bhuey@lnxw.com>, Adam Heath <doogie@debian.org>,
	emann@mrv.com, Gunther Persoons <gunther_persoons@spymac.com>,
	"K.R. Foley" <kr@cybsft.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Florian Schmidt <mista.tapas@gmx.net>,
	Fernando Pablo Lopez-Lezcano <nando@ccrma.Stanford.EDU>,
	Lee Revell <rlrevell@joe-job.com>,
	Rui Nuno Capela <rncbc@rncbc.org>,
	Shane Shrybman <shrybman@aei.ca>,
	Esben Nielsen <simlo@phys.au.dk>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Michal Schmidt <xschmi00@stud.feec.vutbr.cz>
Subject: Re: [patch] Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.10-rc2-mm3-V0.7.32-15
Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2004 23:24:32 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20041210222432.GD7609@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <OFC6899882.DBD65C9D-ON86256F66.00796C43-86256F66.00796C5C@raytheon.com>


* Mark_H_Johnson@raytheon.com <Mark_H_Johnson@raytheon.com> wrote:

> Here is my get_ltrace.sh script (at the end).
> 
> So I read the preempt_max_latency (to see if its changed) before I
> copy the latency_trace output. I am not so sure that cat is really
> doing an "atomic" read when some of the latency traces are over 300
> Kbytes in length.

reading preempt_max_latency ought to be fine to detect changes.

yes, even a 300 KB trace should be read atomically too, even if it takes
3 seconds to save, hence all the different layers of trace buffers. The
kernel does not update the output buffer until the 'cat' has finished.
(unless a parallel 'cat' interferes - all your scripts are serialized,
right?)

> Also note that some of the files were empty :-(. I don't think I've
> seen that symptom before.

hm, an empty file occurs if the saved output trace is empty. This should
only be the case shortly after resetting preempt_max_latency. (or after
bootup, until it's set for the first time.)

> Note that the preempt_max_latency value DID match the last line of the
> trace output in the example I described. It is just the header that
> had some stale data in it.

yeah. It's weird. Ahh .. reviewing the header-generation code again i
noticed a buglet, which could cause spuriously wrong latency values on
SMP systems. Does the patch below fix this particular symptom?

	Ingo

--- linux/kernel/latency.c.orig
+++ linux/kernel/latency.c
@@ -542,7 +542,7 @@ static void update_out_trace(void)
 	 * trace buffer.
 	 */
 	tmp_out = out_tr.traces + 0;
-	*tmp_out = max_tr.traces[0]; // TODO: dont copy the traces
+	*tmp_out = max_tr.traces[max_tr.cpu]; // TODO: dont copy the traces
 	out_tr.cpu = max_tr.cpu;
 	out_entry = tmp_out->trace + 0;
 

  reply	other threads:[~2004-12-10 22:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-12-10 22:06 [patch] Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.10-rc2-mm3-V0.7.32-15 Mark_H_Johnson
2004-12-10 22:24 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-12-13 23:14 Mark_H_Johnson
2004-12-13 20:02 Mark_H_Johnson
2004-12-13 22:39 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-12-13 17:05 Mark_H_Johnson
2004-12-13 22:33 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-12-10 21:58 Mark_H_Johnson
2004-12-10 21:54 Mark_H_Johnson
2004-12-10 22:14 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-12-10 21:31 Mark_H_Johnson
2004-12-10 21:54 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-12-10 21:06 Mark_H_Johnson
2004-12-10 21:40 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-12-10 20:03 Mark_H_Johnson
2004-12-10 17:49 Mark_H_Johnson
2004-12-10 21:09 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-12-10 21:12 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-12-10 21:24 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-12-13  0:16 ` Fernando Lopez-Lezcano
2004-12-13  6:47   ` Ingo Molnar
2004-12-14  0:46     ` Fernando Lopez-Lezcano
2004-12-14  4:42       ` K.R. Foley
2004-12-14  8:47         ` Rui Nuno Capela
2004-12-14 11:35           ` Ingo Molnar
2004-12-09 21:58 [patch] Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.10-rc2-mm3-V0.7.32-6 Mark_H_Johnson
2004-12-09 22:55 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-12-10 10:53   ` [patch] Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.10-rc2-mm3-V0.7.32-15 Ingo Molnar
2004-12-10 14:59     ` Gene Heskett
2004-12-10 15:59       ` Gene Heskett
2004-12-10 19:09     ` Lee Revell

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20041210222432.GD7609@elte.hu \
    --to=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=Mark_H_Johnson@raytheon.com \
    --cc=amit.shah@codito.com \
    --cc=annabellesgarden@yahoo.de \
    --cc=bhuey@lnxw.com \
    --cc=doogie@debian.org \
    --cc=emann@mrv.com \
    --cc=gunther_persoons@spymac.com \
    --cc=kr@cybsft.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mista.tapas@gmx.net \
    --cc=nando@ccrma.Stanford.EDU \
    --cc=rlrevell@joe-job.com \
    --cc=rncbc@rncbc.org \
    --cc=shrybman@aei.ca \
    --cc=simlo@phys.au.dk \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=xschmi00@stud.feec.vutbr.cz \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox