From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261874AbULJXvk (ORCPT ); Fri, 10 Dec 2004 18:51:40 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261876AbULJXvk (ORCPT ); Fri, 10 Dec 2004 18:51:40 -0500 Received: from chello083144090118.chello.pl ([83.144.90.118]:40708 "EHLO plus.ds14.agh.edu.pl") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261874AbULJXvh (ORCPT ); Fri, 10 Dec 2004 18:51:37 -0500 From: =?utf-8?q?Pawe=C5=82_Sikora?= To: Andrew Morton Subject: Re: 2.6.10rc3+cset == oops (fs). Date: Sat, 11 Dec 2004 00:51:34 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.7.1 Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <200412102330.02459.pluto@pld-linux.org> <20041210152555.5c579892.akpm@osdl.org> In-Reply-To: <20041210152555.5c579892.akpm@osdl.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200412110051.35050.pluto@pld-linux.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Saturday 11 of December 2004 00:25, Andrew Morton wrote: > Pawe__ Sikora wrote: > > I've just tried to boot the 2.6.10rc3+cset20041210_0507. > > > > [handcopy of the ooops] > > > > dereferencing null pointer > > eip at: radix_tree_tag_clear 407:lib/radix-tree.c **** 408:lib/radix-tree.c **** if (*pathp->slot == NULL) <=== ooopses here 409:lib/radix-tree.c **** goto out; 410:lib/radix-tree.c **** 1341 .loc 1 408 0 1342 0605 8B45A4 movl -92(%ebp), %eax # .slot, D.9023 1343 0608 8B00 movl (%eax), %eax #* D.9023, 1344 060a 85C0 testl %eax, %eax # 1345 060c 744F je .L132 #, > > trace: > > (...) > > test_clear_page_dirty > > truncate_complete_page > > truncate_inode_pages_range > > truncate_inode_pages > > generic_delete_inode > > sys_unlink > > initrd_load > > prepare_namespace > > (...) > > I can't think of any recent changes whish could cause something like this. > Is this reproducible? If so, could you please work out which kernel > version and bk snapshot introduced the bug? Thanks. 2.6.10rc1+cset20041025_0606 works fine (I'm using it now). 2.6.10rc3+cset20041210_0507 oopses. I'll do more test later... -- /* Copyright (C) 2003, SCO, Inc. This is valuable Intellectual Property. */ #define say(x) lie(x)