From: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
To: "Camilo A. Reyes" <camilo@leamonde.no-ip.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: modprobe: QM_MODULES: Funtion not implemented on kernel 2.6.9
Date: Sat, 11 Dec 2004 22:31:19 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20041212033119.GC1921@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20041212025217.GA16761@leamonde.no-ip.org>
On Sat, Dec 11, 2004 at 08:52:17PM -0600, Camilo A. Reyes wrote:
> > this (and other interesting things) is described here:
> > http://www.linux.org.uk/~davej/docs/post-halloween-2.6.txt
> Wow! Now, thats the stuff! How come that's not included in the
> kernel distro documentation, I'm sure lots of people that are new
> to the kernel will have the same problem. Anyway thanks alot...
I've had a few people asking me to submit it, but I'm not
convinced it would be worthwhile. Would people read it if
they had problems ?
make modules_install prints out a warning pointing them at it,
yet as this thread indicates, not everyone bothers to go there
and read it. Maybe if it was in-tree things would be different,
but I'm not convinced. People want things to 'just work'
rather than have to read about how to make them work.
That said, if it was in-tree it would be easier for people
other than myself to update it as things change.
The current doc is a little out of date (last changed
about 6 months ago), so probably needs a little work
before its ready for submission.
Is there enough interest in this from people to justify
me putting any effort into it ? If theres any value in
having this in tree, I'll submit the current version
to Andrew for -mm, and see if anyone dives in and starts
chopping/changing things.
If this does happen, it'd probably be worth eventually
replacing Documentation/Changes with it.
Dave
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-12-12 3:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-12-11 19:51 modprobe: QM_MODULES: Funtion not implemented on kernel 2.6.9 Camilo A. Reyes
2004-12-11 20:06 ` Ronald Hummelink
2004-12-11 21:14 ` Sean Neakums
2004-12-11 21:46 ` Camilo A. Reyes
2004-12-11 21:56 ` Sean Neakums
2004-12-11 22:08 ` Camilo A. Reyes
2004-12-11 23:46 ` Randy.Dunlap
2004-12-11 23:50 ` Randy.Dunlap
2004-12-12 0:06 ` Jan Engelhardt
[not found] ` <200412111603.16153.ryan@spitfire.gotdns.org>
2004-12-12 0:26 ` Camilo A. Reyes
2004-12-12 2:14 ` Christian Kujau
2004-12-12 2:52 ` Camilo A. Reyes
2004-12-12 3:31 ` Dave Jones [this message]
2004-12-12 5:21 ` Bernd Eckenfels
2004-12-12 16:35 ` Christian Kujau
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20041212033119.GC1921@redhat.com \
--to=davej@redhat.com \
--cc=camilo@leamonde.no-ip.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox