From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261185AbULOMyR (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Dec 2004 07:54:17 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262345AbULOMyR (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Dec 2004 07:54:17 -0500 Received: from ns.virtualhost.dk ([195.184.98.160]:32745 "EHLO virtualhost.dk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261185AbULOMyP (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Dec 2004 07:54:15 -0500 Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2004 13:53:55 +0100 From: Jens Axboe To: Sven Krohlas Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Understanding schedular and slab allocation Message-ID: <20041215125351.GB3034@suse.de> References: <3byuD-2Z8-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <41C030D2.7080604@asbest-online.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <41C030D2.7080604@asbest-online.de> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Dec 15 2004, Sven Krohlas wrote: > Btw: is anybody working on the slab allocator as described in Bonwicks > 2001 paper? Linux already fronts the slab allocator with per-cpu pools. -- Jens Axboe