From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261927AbULPK7z (ORCPT ); Thu, 16 Dec 2004 05:59:55 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261928AbULPK7y (ORCPT ); Thu, 16 Dec 2004 05:59:54 -0500 Received: from parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk ([195.92.249.252]:61312 "EHLO www.linux.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261927AbULPK7x (ORCPT ); Thu, 16 Dec 2004 05:59:53 -0500 Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2004 06:14:52 -0200 From: Marcelo Tosatti To: Horms Cc: lkml - Kernel Mailing List , Alan Cox , Sergey Vlasov , Jason Baron Subject: Re: tty/ldisc fix in 2.4 Message-ID: <20041216081452.GA8113@logos.cnet> References: <20041216044227.GC13680@verge.net.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20041216044227.GC13680@verge.net.au> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Dec 16, 2004 at 01:42:29PM +0900, Horms wrote: > Hi, Hi Horms, > I am unable to find a fix for the tty/ldisc problem (CAN-2004-0814) > in 2.4.28 or 2.4 bitkeeper. I am wondering if anyone can either > point me to what I am missing or indicate if there is a reason > the patch hasn't been included. e.g. it slipped through the cracks. The patch has not been included in 2.4.28 because it was too late in the v2.4.28 cycle for them to be included - they are quite intrusive. And they there didnt seem stable at the time - but yes - we should now make an effort to include the locking fixes in 2.4.29. > The last I can find of it is here: > http://www.ussg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0410.3/1750.html Jason, can you point us at your last patch ? Has it been deployed in production ? > I am just curious, I am quite happy applying Jason Baron's patch. Sergey, I recall you seeing SieFS breakage due to Jason's patch - what was your finding on that?