From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262119AbULQTJN (ORCPT ); Fri, 17 Dec 2004 14:09:13 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262120AbULQTJN (ORCPT ); Fri, 17 Dec 2004 14:09:13 -0500 Received: from gprs215-176.eurotel.cz ([160.218.215.176]:4493 "EHLO amd.ucw.cz") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262119AbULQTJK (ORCPT ); Fri, 17 Dec 2004 14:09:10 -0500 Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2004 20:08:56 +0100 From: Pavel Machek To: Greg KH Cc: Pete Zaitcev , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: debugfs in the namespace Message-ID: <20041217190856.GA29131@elf.ucw.cz> References: <20041216110002.3e0ddf52@lembas.zaitcev.lan> <20041216190835.GE5654@kroah.com> <20041216113357.4c2714bb@lembas.zaitcev.lan> <20041216194224.GA6640@kroah.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20041216194224.GA6640@kroah.com> X-Warning: Reading this can be dangerous to your mental health. User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040722i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi! > > better, but mounting anything under /proc requires a kernel component > > to create a directory, does it not? > > Yes it does, but debugfs could create the mount point, if people agree > that this is a good place to put it (like usbfs does.) > > Personally, I don't want to put it there, but that's just because I hate > proc stuff :) > > So, /debug sounds good to me. Any objections? Yes... /debug is something users may actually use already... Like having scratch filesystem mount on /debug. Pavel -- People were complaining that M$ turns users into beta-testers... ...jr ghea gurz vagb qrirybcref, naq gurl frrz gb yvxr vg gung jnl!