public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com>
To: Park Lee <parklee_sel@yahoo.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ipsec-tools-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: Issue on netconsole vs. Linux kernel oops
Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2004 23:41:37 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20041218074137.GA28322@waste.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20041218060134.77655.qmail@web51503.mail.yahoo.com>

On Fri, Dec 17, 2004 at 10:01:34PM -0800, Park Lee wrote:
> On Fri, 17 Dec 2004 at 08:44, Matt Mackall wrote:
> >
> > Netconsole builds very simple IPv4 packets by hand 
> > without the use of the rest of the IP stack. This 
> > is how it continues to work when the system is 
> > crashing. So it will never be able to build IPSEC 
> > packets.
> > Nor is it likely to do IPv6 any time soon.
> >
> > You can probably get it to work by using a 
> > different IP address for netconsole than you use 
> > for IPSEC, and set up the receiving end to
> > recognize packets from that address as normal 
> > unencrypted IPv4.
> 
> Thank you.
> 
> But that will need at least 3 computers(i.e. 2 for
> IPsec, 1 for receiving end), Am I right?

No, you should be able to configure a non-IPSsec interface on the
receiver, possibly at a fourth address.

-- 
Mathematics is the supreme nostalgia of our time.

  reply	other threads:[~2004-12-18  7:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-12-17 12:12 Issue on netconsole vs. Linux kernel oops Park Lee
2004-12-17 16:44 ` Matt Mackall
2004-12-17 17:03   ` Bill Rugolsky Jr.
2004-12-18  6:01   ` Park Lee
2004-12-18  7:41     ` Matt Mackall [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-12-16 15:00 What's the matter with build-in netconsole? Paulo Marques
2004-12-16 18:48 ` Issue on netconsole vs. Linux kernel oops Park Lee
2004-12-16 18:55   ` Matt Mackall
2004-12-16 19:06     ` linux-os
2004-12-16 19:31       ` Park Lee

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20041218074137.GA28322@waste.org \
    --to=mpm@selenic.com \
    --cc=ipsec-tools-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=parklee_sel@yahoo.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox