From: Nishanth Aravamudan <nacc@us.ibm.com>
To: Zwane Mwaikambo <zwane@arm.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>,
Nish Aravamudan <nish.aravamudan@gmail.com>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@us.ibm.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Dipankar Sarma <dipankar@in.ibm.com>,
Li Shaohua <shaohua.li@intel.com>,
Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Remove RCU abuse in cpu_idle()
Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2004 10:27:11 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20041220182711.GA13972@us.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0412191909580.18310@montezuma.fsmlabs.com>
On Sun, Dec 19, 2004 at 07:10:31PM -0700, Zwane Mwaikambo wrote:
> On Mon, 20 Dec 2004, Nick Piggin wrote:
>
> > On Sun, 2004-12-19 at 18:44 -0700, Zwane Mwaikambo wrote:
> > > On Mon, 20 Dec 2004, Nick Piggin wrote:
> > >
> > > > This thread can possibly be stalled forever if there is a CPU hog
> > > > running, right?
> > >
> > > Yep.
> > >
> > > > In which case, you will want to use ssleep rather than a busy loop.
> > >
> > > Well ssleep essentially does the same thing as the schedule_timeout.
> > >
> >
> > Yes - so long as you set ->state when using schedule_timeout ;)
>
> Nish could you please submit something to switch it to ssleep?
I believe the only files/patches that needed to be changed were the process.c
changes. Here they are re-worked to use ssleep(1) instead of
schedule_timeout(HZ).
Signed-off-by: Nishanth Aravamudan <nacc@us.ibm.com>
--- 2.6.10-rc3-v/arch/i386/kernel/process.c 2004-12-08 13:38:42.000000000 -0800
+++ 2.6.10-rc3/arch/i386/kernel/process.c 2004-12-20 10:15:54.000000000 -0800
@@ -72,6 +72,7 @@ unsigned long thread_saved_pc(struct tas
* Powermanagement idle function, if any..
*/
void (*pm_idle)(void);
+static cpumask_t cpu_idle_map;
void disable_hlt(void)
{
@@ -142,16 +143,16 @@ static void poll_idle (void)
*/
void cpu_idle (void)
{
+ int cpu = smp_processor_id();
+
/* endless idle loop with no priority at all */
while (1) {
while (!need_resched()) {
void (*idle)(void);
- /*
- * Mark this as an RCU critical section so that
- * synchronize_kernel() in the unload path waits
- * for our completion.
- */
- rcu_read_lock();
+
+ if (cpu_isset(cpu, cpu_idle_map))
+ cpu_clear(cpu, cpu_idle_map);
+ rmb();
idle = pm_idle;
if (!idle)
@@ -159,12 +160,24 @@ void cpu_idle (void)
irq_stat[smp_processor_id()].idle_timestamp = jiffies;
idle();
- rcu_read_unlock();
}
schedule();
}
}
+void cpu_idle_wait(void)
+{
+ int cpu;
+
+ for_each_online_cpu(cpu)
+ cpu_set(cpu, cpu_idle_map);
+
+ wmb();
+ while (cpus_equal(cpu_idle_map, cpu_online_map))
+ ssleep(1);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cpu_idle_wait);
+
/*
* This uses new MONITOR/MWAIT instructions on P4 processors with PNI,
* which can obviate IPI to trigger checking of need_resched.
--- 2.6.10-rc3-v/arch/ia64/kernel/process.c 2004-12-08 13:38:43.000000000 -0800
+++ 2.6.10-rc3/arch/ia64/kernel/process.c 2004-12-20 10:16:18.000000000 -0800
@@ -46,6 +46,7 @@
#include "sigframe.h"
void (*ia64_mark_idle)(int);
+static cpumask_t cpu_idle_map;
unsigned long boot_option_idle_override = 0;
EXPORT_SYMBOL(boot_option_idle_override);
@@ -225,10 +226,24 @@ static inline void play_dead(void)
}
#endif /* CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU */
+void cpu_idle_wait(void)
+{
+ int cpu;
+
+ for_each_online_cpu(cpu)
+ cpu_set(cpu, cpu_idle_map);
+
+ wmb();
+ while (cpus_equal(cpu_idle_map, cpu_online_map))
+ ssleep(1);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cpu_idle_wait);
+
void __attribute__((noreturn))
cpu_idle (void *unused)
{
void (*mark_idle)(int) = ia64_mark_idle;
+ int cpu = smp_processor_id();
/* endless idle loop with no priority at all */
while (1) {
@@ -241,17 +256,14 @@ cpu_idle (void *unused)
if (mark_idle)
(*mark_idle)(1);
- /*
- * Mark this as an RCU critical section so that
- * synchronize_kernel() in the unload path waits
- * for our completion.
- */
- rcu_read_lock();
+
+ if (cpu_isset(cpu, cpu_idle_map))
+ cpu_clear(cpu, cpu_idle_map);
+ rmb();
idle = pm_idle;
if (!idle)
idle = default_idle;
(*idle)();
- rcu_read_unlock();
}
if (mark_idle)
--- 2.6.10-rc3-v/arch/x86_64/kernel/process.c 2004-12-08 13:38:45.000000000 -0800
+++ 2.6.10-rc3/arch/x86_64/kernel/process.c 2004-12-20 10:16:59.000000000 -0800
@@ -61,6 +61,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(boot_option_idle_override)
* Powermanagement idle function, if any..
*/
void (*pm_idle)(void);
+static cpumask_t cpu_idle_map;
void disable_hlt(void)
{
@@ -123,6 +124,19 @@ static void poll_idle (void)
}
}
+void cpu_idle_wait(void)
+{
+ int cpu;
+
+ for_each_online_cpu(cpu)
+ cpu_set(cpu, cpu_idle_map);
+
+ wmb();
+ while (cpus_equal(cpu_idle_map, cpu_online_map))
+ ssleep(1);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cpu_idle_wait);
+
/*
* The idle thread. There's no useful work to be
* done, so just try to conserve power and have a
@@ -131,21 +145,20 @@ static void poll_idle (void)
*/
void cpu_idle (void)
{
+ int cpu = smp_processor_id();
+
/* endless idle loop with no priority at all */
while (1) {
while (!need_resched()) {
void (*idle)(void);
- /*
- * Mark this as an RCU critical section so that
- * synchronize_kernel() in the unload path waits
- * for our completion.
- */
- rcu_read_lock();
+
+ if (cpu_isset(cpu, cpu_idle_map))
+ cpu_clear(cpu, cpu_idle_map);
+ rmb();
idle = pm_idle;
if (!idle)
idle = default_idle;
idle();
- rcu_read_unlock();
}
schedule();
}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-12-20 22:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-12-05 0:45 Fw: [RFC] Strange code in cpu_idle() Paul E. McKenney
2004-12-06 0:16 ` Stephen Rothwell
2004-12-06 6:46 ` Stephen Rothwell
2004-12-06 10:00 ` Zwane Mwaikambo
2004-12-06 7:20 ` Andrew Morton
2004-12-06 9:38 ` Zwane Mwaikambo
2004-12-06 16:04 ` Paul E. McKenney
2004-12-06 16:47 ` Zwane Mwaikambo
2004-12-06 19:22 ` Paul E. McKenney
2004-12-11 15:07 ` Zwane Mwaikambo
2004-12-12 4:54 ` [PATCH] Remove RCU abuse " Zwane Mwaikambo
2004-12-12 5:06 ` Zwane Mwaikambo
2004-12-12 5:49 ` Zwane Mwaikambo
2004-12-13 6:13 ` Andrew Morton
2004-12-13 6:22 ` Zwane Mwaikambo
2004-12-13 6:32 ` Andrew Morton
2004-12-13 7:09 ` Zwane Mwaikambo
2004-12-13 6:41 ` Andrew Morton
2004-12-13 7:13 ` Zwane Mwaikambo
2004-12-19 2:40 ` Nish Aravamudan
2004-12-20 0:59 ` Zwane Mwaikambo
2004-12-20 1:15 ` Nick Piggin
2004-12-20 1:44 ` Zwane Mwaikambo
2004-12-20 1:56 ` Nick Piggin
2004-12-20 2:10 ` Zwane Mwaikambo
2004-12-20 2:30 ` Nish Aravamudan
2004-12-20 18:27 ` Nishanth Aravamudan [this message]
2004-12-20 22:57 ` Zwane Mwaikambo
2004-12-20 23:15 ` Andrew Morton
2004-12-20 23:16 ` Zwane Mwaikambo
2004-12-20 23:26 ` Nishanth Aravamudan
2004-12-20 2:26 ` Nish Aravamudan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20041220182711.GA13972@us.ibm.com \
--to=nacc@us.ibm.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=dipankar@in.ibm.com \
--cc=len.brown@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au \
--cc=nish.aravamudan@gmail.com \
--cc=paulmck@us.ibm.com \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
--cc=shaohua.li@intel.com \
--cc=zwane@arm.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox