public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: jesse <jessezx@yahoo.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Gurus, a silly question for preemptive behavior
Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2004 18:43:47 -0800 (PST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20041221024347.3004.qmail@web52606.mail.yahoo.com> (raw)

 
As i know, in linux, user space application is
preemptive at any time. however, linux kernel is NOT
preemptive, that means, even some event is finished,
Linux kernel scheduler itself still can't have
opportunity to interrupt the current user application
and switch it out. it is called scheduler latency.
normally , the latency is about 88us in mean , maximum
: 200ms. Thus, the short latency shouldn't impact user
applications too much and is not a problem. It is an
issue in those embedded voice processing systems by
introducing jitters, thus smart people came up with
two kernel schedule patch: preemptive patch and low
latency patch. 

My application which has nice value as 10 of low
priority, however, it holds the CPU and excludes other
applciations that have higher priority (nice 0) to
run, my application causes CPU pegging. 

Thus, I am wondering: why  user space application
can't be effectively interrupted? why there is CPU
pegging?   Could you please educate me 
on this particular issue and shed me some light to
address it? 

my system: 
[root@sa-c2-7 proc]# uname  -a 
Linux sa-c2-7 2.4.21-15.ELsmp #1 SMP Thu Apr 22
00:18:24 EDT 2004 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux 

thanks!

             reply	other threads:[~2004-12-21  2:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-12-21  2:43 jesse [this message]
2004-12-21  5:59 ` Gurus, a silly question for preemptive behavior Con Kolivas
2004-12-21 18:32   ` jesse
2004-12-21 18:44     ` Paulo Marques
2004-12-21 19:03       ` jesse
2004-12-21 19:23         ` Paulo Marques
2004-12-21 21:35         ` Con Kolivas
2004-12-21 23:07           ` jesse
2004-12-22  2:16             ` Con Kolivas
2004-12-22 12:39             ` K.R. Foley
2004-12-26 19:30 ` Stephen Satchell

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20041221024347.3004.qmail@web52606.mail.yahoo.com \
    --to=jessezx@yahoo.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox