From: Jakob Oestergaard <jakob@unthought.net>
To: Jan Kasprzak <kas@fi.muni.cz>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kruty@fi.muni.cz
Subject: Re: XFS: inode with st_mode == 0
Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2004 09:41:58 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20041222084158.GG347@unthought.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20041221184304.GF16913@fi.muni.cz>
On Tue, Dec 21, 2004 at 07:43:04PM +0100, Jan Kasprzak wrote:
...
> :
> : No, the problem I've fixed was related to XFS getting the inode version
> : number wrong - or at least different than NFSD expects.
> :
> We have applied these two patches to 2.6.10-rc2, but this
> does not help. A few minutes ago I've got the "?----------" file
> again from my test script. This time it took >4 hours (it was
> about an hour or so without this patch).
I run the patch on 2.6.9 - it solved the problem in the common case.
Before the patch, I was unable to complete a "cvs checkout" of a
moderately large tree - would end up with undeletable directories and
lots of other weird things... After the patch, I can run cvs checkout.
However, we still see the problem - so the patch does not solve this
completely, as you have observed as well.
Our most common situation is that a new file gets created as a symlink
pointing to itself, instead of as a regular file.
It also happens regularly, that a command (be it cvs, etags, ld or
something else) reports EINVAL when attempting to create/write a file.
So, status on my side is; things still suck, but they suck less than on
vanilla 2.6.9
--
/ jakob
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-12-22 8:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-12-09 12:59 XFS: inode with st_mode == 0 Jan Kasprzak
2004-12-09 13:53 ` Jakob Oestergaard
2004-12-09 14:07 ` Jan Kasprzak
2004-12-09 21:54 ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-12-14 23:40 ` Jakob Oestergaard
2004-12-21 18:43 ` Jan Kasprzak
2004-12-22 8:41 ` Jakob Oestergaard [this message]
2004-12-22 18:23 ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-12-23 15:01 ` Jakob Oestergaard
2005-01-04 8:48 ` Jakob Oestergaard
2005-01-05 11:34 ` Christoph Hellwig
2005-01-14 18:14 ` David Greaves
2005-01-14 18:23 ` Jakob Oestergaard
2005-01-15 2:09 ` Nathan Scott
2005-01-17 0:53 ` Jakob Oestergaard
2005-01-16 13:51 ` Christoph Hellwig
2005-01-17 10:07 ` Jakob Oestergaard
2005-01-17 11:55 ` Jan-Frode Myklebust
2005-01-17 13:48 ` Anders Saaby
2005-01-17 21:31 ` journaled filesystems -- known instability; Was: " Jeffrey Hundstad
2005-01-17 20:54 ` Alan Cox
2005-01-20 22:30 ` Jeffrey E. Hundstad
2005-01-25 12:47 ` Stephen C. Tweedie
2005-01-25 15:09 ` Jeffrey Hundstad
2005-01-25 15:37 ` Stephen C. Tweedie
2005-01-28 20:15 ` Jeffrey E. Hundstad
2005-01-28 21:00 ` Stephen C. Tweedie
2005-01-28 21:06 ` Jeffrey E. Hundstad
2005-01-18 11:45 ` Jan Kasprzak
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20041222084158.GG347@unthought.net \
--to=jakob@unthought.net \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=kas@fi.muni.cz \
--cc=kruty@fi.muni.cz \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox