From: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>
To: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
Cc: mdharm-usb@one-eyed-alien.net, zaitcev@yahoo.com,
linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: RFC: [2.6 patch] let BLK_DEV_UB depend on USB_STORAGE=n
Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2004 03:40:31 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20041223024031.GO5217@stusta.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20041220003146.GB11358@kroah.com>
On Sun, Dec 19, 2004 at 04:31:46PM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 20, 2004 at 01:16:44AM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > I've already seen people crippling their usb-storage driver with
> > enabling BLK_DEV_UB - and I doubt the warning in the help text added
> > after 2.6.9 will fix all such problems.
> >
> > Is there except for kernel size any good reason for using BLK_DEV_UB
> > instead of USB_STORAGE?
>
> You don't want to use the scsi layer? You like the stability of it at
> times? :)
>
> > If not, I'd suggest the patch below to let BLK_DEV_UB depend
> > on EMBEDDED.
>
> No, it's good for non-embedded boxes too.
My current understanding is:
- BLK_DEV_UB supports a subset of what USB_STORAGE can support
- for an average user, there's no reason to enable BLK_DEV_UB
- if you really know what you are doing, there might be several reasons
why you might want to use BLK_DEV_UB
What about the patch below to let BLK_DEV_UB depend on USB_STORAGE=n?
If you really know what you are doing, you'll also know that you have to
set USB_STORAGE=n before you can enable BLK_DEV_UB.
diffstat output:
drivers/block/Kconfig | 2 +-
drivers/usb/storage/unusual_devs.h | 2 --
drivers/usb/storage/usb.c | 4 ----
3 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 7 deletions(-)
Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>
--- linux-2.6.10-rc3-mm1-full/drivers/block/Kconfig.old 2004-12-20 00:52:22.000000000 +0100
+++ linux-2.6.10-rc3-mm1-full/drivers/block/Kconfig 2004-12-23 03:09:14.000000000 +0100
@@ -303,7 +303,7 @@
config BLK_DEV_UB
tristate "Low Performance USB Block driver"
- depends on USB
+ depends on USB && USB_STORAGE=n
help
This driver supports certain USB attached storage devices
such as flash keys.
--- linux-2.6.10-rc3-mm1-full/drivers/usb/storage/unusual_devs.h.old 2004-12-23 03:09:42.000000000 +0100
+++ linux-2.6.10-rc3-mm1-full/drivers/usb/storage/unusual_devs.h 2004-12-23 03:09:53.000000000 +0100
@@ -549,13 +549,11 @@
US_SC_SCSI, US_PR_CB, NULL,
US_FL_SINGLE_LUN ),
-#if !defined(CONFIG_BLK_DEV_UB) && !defined(CONFIG_BLK_DEV_UB_MODULE)
UNUSUAL_DEV( 0x0781, 0x0002, 0x0009, 0x0009,
"Sandisk",
"ImageMate SDDR-31",
US_SC_DEVICE, US_PR_DEVICE, NULL,
US_FL_IGNORE_SER ),
-#endif
UNUSUAL_DEV( 0x0781, 0x0100, 0x0100, 0x0100,
"Sandisk",
--- linux-2.6.10-rc3-mm1-full/drivers/usb/storage/usb.c.old 2004-12-23 03:10:00.000000000 +0100
+++ linux-2.6.10-rc3-mm1-full/drivers/usb/storage/usb.c 2004-12-23 03:10:13.000000000 +0100
@@ -144,9 +144,7 @@
{ USB_INTERFACE_INFO(USB_CLASS_MASS_STORAGE, US_SC_QIC, US_PR_BULK) },
{ USB_INTERFACE_INFO(USB_CLASS_MASS_STORAGE, US_SC_UFI, US_PR_BULK) },
{ USB_INTERFACE_INFO(USB_CLASS_MASS_STORAGE, US_SC_8070, US_PR_BULK) },
-#if !defined(CONFIG_BLK_DEV_UB) && !defined(CONFIG_BLK_DEV_UB_MODULE)
{ USB_INTERFACE_INFO(USB_CLASS_MASS_STORAGE, US_SC_SCSI, US_PR_BULK) },
-#endif
/* Terminating entry */
{ }
@@ -220,10 +218,8 @@
.useTransport = US_PR_BULK},
{ .useProtocol = US_SC_8070,
.useTransport = US_PR_BULK},
-#if !defined(CONFIG_BLK_DEV_UB) && !defined(CONFIG_BLK_DEV_UB_MODULE)
{ .useProtocol = US_SC_SCSI,
.useTransport = US_PR_BULK},
-#endif
/* Terminating entry */
{ NULL }
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-12-23 2:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-12-20 0:16 RFC: [2.6 patch] let BLK_DEV_UB depend on EMBEDDED Adrian Bunk
2004-12-20 0:29 ` Pete Zaitcev
2004-12-20 0:31 ` Greg KH
2004-12-20 1:35 ` Adrian Bunk
2004-12-20 4:51 ` Pete Zaitcev
2004-12-20 5:09 ` Randy.Dunlap
2004-12-20 6:20 ` Matthew Dharm
2004-12-20 6:37 ` Pete Zaitcev
2004-12-20 7:28 ` [linux-usb-devel] " Phil Dibowitz
2004-12-20 8:09 ` Matthew Dharm
2004-12-20 8:25 ` [linux-usb-devel] " Phil Dibowitz
2004-12-20 8:44 ` Pete Zaitcev
2004-12-20 8:59 ` [linux-usb-devel] " Phil Dibowitz
2004-12-20 12:02 ` Ed Tomlinson
2004-12-20 15:28 ` [linux-usb-devel] " Alan Stern
2004-12-20 15:35 ` Greg KH
2004-12-20 20:46 ` Lee Revell
2004-12-22 8:10 ` Rob Browning
2004-12-23 1:45 ` Theodore Ts'o
2004-12-20 6:43 ` David Brownell
2004-12-20 7:06 ` Pete Zaitcev
2004-12-20 16:03 ` [linux-usb-devel] " David Brownell
2004-12-20 6:30 ` Pete Zaitcev
2004-12-20 15:25 ` [linux-usb-devel] " Alan Stern
2004-12-23 2:40 ` Adrian Bunk [this message]
2005-01-19 22:07 ` RFC: [2.6 patch] let BLK_DEV_UB depend on USB_STORAGE=n Greg KH
2005-01-20 2:49 ` Matthew Dharm
2005-01-21 0:04 ` Greg KH
2005-01-24 11:48 ` David Woodhouse
2005-01-24 17:49 ` Pete Zaitcev
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20041223024031.GO5217@stusta.de \
--to=bunk@stusta.de \
--cc=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=mdharm-usb@one-eyed-alien.net \
--cc=zaitcev@yahoo.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox