Re: [PATCH] fix conflicting cpu_idle() declarations

William Lee Irwin III
2004-12-28T03:23:02Z

On Tue, Dec 28, 2004 at 11:55:16AM +0900, Hirokazu Takata wrote:
> I think it is OK for m32r.
> BTW, you moved the definition of cpu_idle() to smp.h.
> It may not be included from arch/*/process.c in some archs.
> Is it OK?

It should be okay to include even on UP-only arches, IIRC it has stubs
for UP versions of various locking primitives etc. used widely
throughout the kernel.

-- wli