From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261765AbUL1Hd5 (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Dec 2004 02:33:57 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261764AbUL1HYB (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Dec 2004 02:24:01 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([66.187.233.31]:62920 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262104AbUL1GAU (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Dec 2004 01:00:20 -0500 Date: Tue, 28 Dec 2004 00:59:33 -0500 From: Dave Jones To: Manfred Spraul Cc: Patrick McHardy , Alan Cox , Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: PATCH: kmalloc packet slab Message-ID: <20041228055933.GA5481@redhat.com> Mail-Followup-To: Dave Jones , Manfred Spraul , Patrick McHardy , Alan Cox , Linux Kernel Mailing List References: <41D04977.2040902@colorfullife.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <41D04977.2040902@colorfullife.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Dec 27, 2004 at 06:42:15PM +0100, Manfred Spraul wrote: > Hmm. If the shared_info is that large then the patch won't help much. > Alan - what is printed in the /proc/slabinfo line for the new cache? On my laptop which has been up for 5 days, and seen quite a bit of network traffic over the xmas holidays.. size-1620(DMA) 0 0 1632 5 2 : tunables 24 12 0 : slabdata 0 0 0 size-1620 35 35 1632 5 2 : tunables 24 12 0 : slabdata 7 7 0 Dave