Re: [RFC 2.6.10 1/22] xfrm: Add direction information to xfrm_state

Jan-Benedict Glaw
2004-12-30T16:36:24Z

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1037 bytes --]

On Thu, 2004-12-30 11:16:49 -0500, Dave Dillow <dave@thedillows.org>
wrote in message <1104423409.23254.9.camel@dillow.idleaire.com>:
> On Thu, 2004-12-30 at 04:48, Jan-Benedict Glaw wrote:
> > On Thu, 2004-12-30 03:48:34 -0500, David Dillow <dave@thedillows.org>
> > wrote in message <20041230035000.10@ori.thedillows.org>:
> > > +enum {
> > > + XFRM_STATE_DIR_UNKNOWN,
> > > + XFRM_STATE_DIR_IN,
> > > + XFRM_STATE_DIR_OUT,
> > > +};
> >
> > Any specific reason to first define such a nice enum and then using int
> > in the struct?
>
> Just following the current style in net/xfrm.h, see xfrm_state.km.state
> and XFRM_STATE_*.

Hmmm... Maybe I'd prepare patches then :)

MfG, JBG

--
Jan-Benedict Glaw jbglaw@lug-owl.de . +49-172-7608481 _ O _
"Eine Freie Meinung in einem Freien Kopf | Gegen Zensur | Gegen Krieg _ _ O
fuer einen Freien Staat voll Freier Bürger" | im Internet! | im Irak! O O O
ret = do_actions((curr | FREE_SPEECH) & ~(NEW_COPYRIGHT_LAW | DRM | TCPA));

[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]