Re: Latency results with 2.6.10 - looks good

Andrew Morton
2005-01-01T09:23:03Z

Lee Revell <rlrevell@joe-job.com> wrote:
>
> Followup: other audio users have confirmed that 2.6.10 is the best
> release yet latency-wise. It works most of the time at 64 frames
> (~1.33ms latency).
>
> Now, the bad news: there are still enough xruns to make it not quite
> good enough for, say, a recording studio; as we all know with realtime
> constraints the worst case scenario is important.

The kernel which you should be testing is most-recent -mm. The -mm kernels
have had a bunch of latency improvements which are queued for 2.6.11. We
need to know how that stuff performs - 2.6.10 is largely uninteresting from
a development POV.