From: Russell King <rmk+lkml@arm.linux.org.uk>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
Erik Mouw <erik@harddisk-recovery.com>,
Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>, Domen Puncer <domen@coderock.org>,
lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [patch] maintainers: remove moderated arm list
Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2005 10:19:21 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050104101921.C9409@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050104093326.GA2408@infradead.org>; from hch@infradead.org on Tue, Jan 04, 2005 at 09:33:26AM +0000
On Tue, Jan 04, 2005 at 09:33:26AM +0000, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 04, 2005 at 09:25:15AM +0000, Russell King wrote:
> > In that case, you can personally choose not to send mail there anymore.
> > It's completely up to you. No one is forcing you to send email to any
> > address.
>
> I don't plan to force anyone to do anything with their mailinglists.
> But we shouldn't mention lists with stupid policies as maintainer contacts.
As Alan has already pointed out, there's more to the MAINTAINERS file
than just pointing out to main line kernel developers where to send
their patches.
> > I don't care if you personally agree with that or not. That's not what
> > it's about. It's about taking reasonable steps to cover ones own ass
> > and the communities ass to ensure survival in silly-law environments.
>
> Maybe you should offshore your lists to conuntries with saner laws (or
> at least to less obedient people..)
s/or at least to less obedient people/and offshore the list administrators
as well/
People seem rather unwilling to do so because it's a hell of a lot of
hastle to look after properly. The suggestion has been made in the
past and always comes to nothing.
--
Russell King
Linux kernel 2.6 ARM Linux - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/
maintainer of: 2.6 PCMCIA - http://pcmcia.arm.linux.org.uk/
2.6 Serial core
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-01-04 10:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-12-25 17:08 [patch] maintainers: remove moderated arm list Domen Puncer
2004-12-25 17:21 ` Russell King
2004-12-25 17:34 ` Domen Puncer
2005-01-03 17:54 ` [patch] " Adrian Bunk
2005-01-03 18:25 ` Russell King
2005-01-04 17:33 ` Adrian Bunk
2005-01-05 12:52 ` Horst von Brand
2005-01-04 8:54 ` Erik Mouw
2005-01-04 9:00 ` Christoph Hellwig
2005-01-04 9:25 ` Russell King
2005-01-04 9:33 ` Christoph Hellwig
2005-01-04 10:19 ` Russell King [this message]
2005-01-05 9:20 ` Jes Sorensen
2005-01-05 14:04 ` Alan Cox
2005-01-06 9:20 ` Russell King
2005-01-04 21:13 ` Lee Revell
2005-01-05 0:07 ` Alan Cox
2005-01-05 1:19 ` Lee Revell
2005-01-04 22:03 ` Alan Cox
2005-01-04 9:08 ` Russell King
2005-01-04 9:37 ` Miles Bader
2005-01-04 9:48 ` Dave Airlie
2005-01-04 10:18 ` Erik Mouw
2005-01-04 13:05 ` Miles Bader
2005-01-04 13:37 ` Erik Mouw
2005-01-04 22:03 ` Alan Cox
2005-01-09 20:26 ` Pavel Machek
2004-12-26 16:50 ` Alan Cox
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050104101921.C9409@flint.arm.linux.org.uk \
--to=rmk+lkml@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=bunk@stusta.de \
--cc=domen@coderock.org \
--cc=erik@harddisk-recovery.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox