From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262405AbVADWrB (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Jan 2005 17:47:01 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262412AbVADWp2 (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Jan 2005 17:45:28 -0500 Received: from bender.bawue.de ([193.7.176.20]:31946 "EHLO bender.bawue.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262405AbVADWof (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Jan 2005 17:44:35 -0500 Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2005 23:44:27 +0100 From: Joerg Sommrey To: Nathan Scott Cc: Linux kernel mailing list Subject: Re: Oops on 2.6.9-ac16: xfs, dm and md may be involved Message-ID: <20050104224427.GB9135@sommrey.de> Mail-Followup-To: Joerg Sommrey , Nathan Scott , Linux kernel mailing list References: <20041221185754.GA28356@sommrey.de> <20041222182606.GA14733@infradead.org> <20041222195203.GA24857@sommrey.de> <20041223101143.A702917@wobbly.melbourne.sgi.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20041223101143.A702917@wobbly.melbourne.sgi.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040722i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Dec 23, 2004 at 10:11:43AM +1100, Nathan Scott wrote: > > Certainly wasn't XFS using stack in the initial oops, perhaps > the lower layers, but I'm a bit sceptical. Almost certainly > this is a device mapper snapshot problem, the DM folks should > be able to analyse it further. > I just want to let you know that there hasn't been any problem until now using 2.6.10-ac2. Though I didn't see changes in the dm-snapshot code, there are quite a lot in dm-crypt. This seems to be the key: my problems always appeared with a crypted device mounted. But I didn't realize this dependency until now... Thanks again, -jo -- -rw-r--r-- 1 jo users 63 2005-01-04 22:50 /home/jo/.signature