public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: Gildas LE NADAN <gildas.le-nadan@inha.fr>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: unkillable processes using samba, xfs and lvm2 snapshots (k 2.6.10)
Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2005 11:37:01 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050105113701.GA31391@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <41D14251.4030704@inha.fr>

On Tue, Dec 28, 2004 at 12:24:01PM +0100, Gildas LE NADAN wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I experience hangs on samba processes on a filer using xfs over lvm2 as 
> data partitions, when there is active snapshots of the xfs partitions.
> 
> I have a clone of the production server (same software, same hardware) 
> where the situation can be reproduced perfectly.
> 
> Testings showed that the result was the same, whether the snapshots were 
> mounted or not : smbd processes are locked and unkillable while the 
> machine is normaly working otherwise, except software reboot is 
> impossible and hardware reset is needed.
> 
> I noticed Brad Fitzpatrick's case in kernel 2.6.10 changelog 
> (http://lkml.org/lkml/2004/11/14/98) and tested kernel 2.6.10 today 
> without success.
> 
> Configuration is the following :
> - supermicro m/b with dual Xeon 2,8Ghz (SMT is active)
> - 1 GB ram,
> - adaptec u320 raid controler
> - kernel 2.6.10
> - debian sarge
> - samba 3
> - LVM2
> - XFS with quota turned on
> 
> All software are from debian sarge packages, except the kernel.
> 
> I'm not able to determine if the problem is more xfs, device mapper or 
> samba related, and was not able to do extensive testings (using a 
> different filesystem, testing with a different daemon, etc...), but 
> SMT/SMP testings showed that this is not a SMP/SMT related problem.
> 
> I've compiled the kernel with the debugging options, so I might provide 
> additional informations if needed as in Brad's case.

I'll try to reproduce your problems soon.


      parent reply	other threads:[~2005-01-05 11:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-12-28 11:24 unkillable processes using samba, xfs and lvm2 snapshots (k 2.6.10) Gildas LE NADAN
2004-12-28 11:39 ` bert hubert
2004-12-28 15:15   ` unkillable processes using samba, xfs and lvm2 snapshots (k 2.6.10) [includes backtrace] Gildas LE NADAN
2004-12-28 14:07 ` unkillable processes using samba, xfs and lvm2 snapshots (k 2.6.10) Gene Heskett
2005-01-02 12:41   ` Christian Leber
2004-12-29 18:01 ` Julien BLACHE
2005-01-05 11:37 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20050105113701.GA31391@infradead.org \
    --to=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=gildas.le-nadan@inha.fr \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox