From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261525AbVAGSrO (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 Jan 2005 13:47:14 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261522AbVAGSrO (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 Jan 2005 13:47:14 -0500 Received: from e2.ny.us.ibm.com ([32.97.182.142]:59885 "EHLO e2.ny.us.ibm.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261525AbVAGSrC (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 Jan 2005 13:47:02 -0500 Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2005 10:29:28 -0800 From: Greg KH To: David Brownell Cc: linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, Linux Kernel list Subject: Re: [patch 2.6.10] ehci "hc died" on startup (chip bug workaround) Message-ID: <20050107182928.GA29599@kroah.com> References: <200501051435.42666.david-b@pacbell.net> <20050107174328.GB28878@kroah.com> <200501071005.43520.david-b@pacbell.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200501071005.43520.david-b@pacbell.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Jan 07, 2005 at 10:05:43AM -0800, David Brownell wrote: > On Friday 07 January 2005 9:43 am, Greg KH wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 05, 2005 at 02:35:42PM -0800, David Brownell wrote: > > > We seem to have tracked some annoying board-coupled EHCI startup > > > problems to a chip bug, with a simple workaround. Please merge. > > > > Hm, I get a reject from this: > > ... > > > > What kernel tree is it against? > > Probably my gadget-2.6 tree; here's one that applies against > current 2.5 BK or your USB integration tree. Sorry! Ah, much better, that worked. Thanks, applied. greg k-h