From: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
To: viro@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [RFC] remove usage of block_subsys.rwsem in genhd.c
Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2005 13:57:53 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050111215753.GA18663@kroah.com> (raw)
Hi,
In auditing all of the subsystem code that uses the rwsem with the idea
to remove it (pushing it upwards so that the driver core works
properly), I noticed that the block code is using it.
Do you have any complaints about the following patch that gets rid of
using the rwsem, in favor of a normal semaphore? It also drops the
major_names_lock, as all areas that were using that, are also protected
by the new semaphore.
Patch is against the latest -bk tree.
diffstat:
drivers/block/genhd.c | 31 ++++++++++++-------------------
1 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
thanks,
greg k-h
-----
Block: Remove block_subsys.rwsem usage
A new, local semaphore is used, and the major_names_lock spinlock is
dropped, as it is no longer needed with this patch. The goal is to
remove the subsys.rwsem entirely in the future, hence the need for this
change.
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <greg@kroah.com>
--- a/drivers/block/genhd.c 2005-01-07 11:18:22 -08:00
+++ b/drivers/block/genhd.c 2005-01-11 12:53:47 -08:00
@@ -19,10 +19,11 @@
static struct subsystem block_subsys;
+static DECLARE_MUTEX(block_subsys_sem);
+
/*
* Can be deleted altogether. Later.
*
- * Modified under both block_subsys.rwsem and major_names_lock.
*/
static struct blk_major_name {
struct blk_major_name *next;
@@ -30,8 +31,6 @@ static struct blk_major_name {
char name[16];
} *major_names[MAX_PROBE_HASH];
-static spinlock_t major_names_lock = SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED;
-
/* index in the above - for now: assume no multimajor ranges */
static inline int major_to_index(int major)
{
@@ -47,13 +46,13 @@ int get_blkdev_list(char *p)
len = sprintf(p, "\nBlock devices:\n");
- down_read(&block_subsys.rwsem);
+ down(&block_subsys_sem);
for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(major_names); i++) {
for (n = major_names[i]; n; n = n->next)
len += sprintf(p+len, "%3d %s\n",
n->major, n->name);
}
- up_read(&block_subsys.rwsem);
+ up(&block_subsys_sem);
return len;
}
@@ -63,9 +62,8 @@ int register_blkdev(unsigned int major,
{
struct blk_major_name **n, *p;
int index, ret = 0;
- unsigned long flags;
- down_write(&block_subsys.rwsem);
+ down(&block_subsys_sem);
/* temporary */
if (major == 0) {
@@ -95,7 +93,6 @@ int register_blkdev(unsigned int major,
p->next = NULL;
index = major_to_index(major);
- spin_lock_irqsave(&major_names_lock, flags);
for (n = &major_names[index]; *n; n = &(*n)->next) {
if ((*n)->major == major)
break;
@@ -104,7 +101,6 @@ int register_blkdev(unsigned int major,
*n = p;
else
ret = -EBUSY;
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&major_names_lock, flags);
if (ret < 0) {
printk("register_blkdev: cannot get major %d for %s\n",
@@ -112,7 +108,7 @@ int register_blkdev(unsigned int major,
kfree(p);
}
out:
- up_write(&block_subsys.rwsem);
+ up(&block_subsys_sem);
return ret;
}
@@ -124,11 +120,9 @@ int unregister_blkdev(unsigned int major
struct blk_major_name **n;
struct blk_major_name *p = NULL;
int index = major_to_index(major);
- unsigned long flags;
int ret = 0;
- down_write(&block_subsys.rwsem);
- spin_lock_irqsave(&major_names_lock, flags);
+ down(&block_subsys_sem);
for (n = &major_names[index]; *n; n = &(*n)->next)
if ((*n)->major == major)
break;
@@ -138,8 +132,7 @@ int unregister_blkdev(unsigned int major
p = *n;
*n = p->next;
}
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&major_names_lock, flags);
- up_write(&block_subsys.rwsem);
+ up(&block_subsys_sem);
kfree(p);
return ret;
@@ -233,7 +226,7 @@ static void *part_start(struct seq_file
struct list_head *p;
loff_t l = *pos;
- down_read(&block_subsys.rwsem);
+ down(&block_subsys_sem);
list_for_each(p, &block_subsys.kset.list)
if (!l--)
return list_entry(p, struct gendisk, kobj.entry);
@@ -250,7 +243,7 @@ static void *part_next(struct seq_file *
static void part_stop(struct seq_file *part, void *v)
{
- up_read(&block_subsys.rwsem);
+ up(&block_subsys_sem);
}
static int show_partition(struct seq_file *part, void *v)
@@ -508,7 +501,7 @@ static void *diskstats_start(struct seq_
loff_t k = *pos;
struct list_head *p;
- down_read(&block_subsys.rwsem);
+ down(&block_subsys_sem);
list_for_each(p, &block_subsys.kset.list)
if (!k--)
return list_entry(p, struct gendisk, kobj.entry);
@@ -525,7 +518,7 @@ static void *diskstats_next(struct seq_f
static void diskstats_stop(struct seq_file *part, void *v)
{
- up_read(&block_subsys.rwsem);
+ up(&block_subsys_sem);
}
static int diskstats_show(struct seq_file *s, void *v)
reply other threads:[~2005-01-11 22:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050111215753.GA18663@kroah.com \
--to=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=viro@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox