From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262313AbVAOTWF (ORCPT ); Sat, 15 Jan 2005 14:22:05 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262317AbVAOTWC (ORCPT ); Sat, 15 Jan 2005 14:22:02 -0500 Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.210]:14538 "EHLO mail.lst.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262313AbVAOTVp (ORCPT ); Sat, 15 Jan 2005 14:21:45 -0500 Date: Sat, 15 Jan 2005 20:21:34 +0100 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Roman Zippel Cc: Christoph Hellwig , akpm@osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] cleanup virtual console <-> selection.c interface Message-ID: <20050115192134.GA1834@lst.de> References: <20041231143457.GA9165@lst.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i X-Spam-Score: -4.901 () BAYES_00 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Jan 15, 2005 at 04:36:55AM +0100, Roman Zippel wrote: > I should really sent out my own patches faster. :) > I have three patches which take this a bit further and removes these > macros completely and does some other small cleanups. It saves a bit more > than 3KB. I was planning to do that aswell and have a few patches ontop already. But obviously I don't care which set gets in as long as the mess gets sorted out.