From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262696AbVAQFna (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Jan 2005 00:43:30 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262699AbVAQFna (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Jan 2005 00:43:30 -0500 Received: from mail.suse.de ([195.135.220.2]:41897 "EHLO Cantor.suse.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262696AbVAQFn2 (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Jan 2005 00:43:28 -0500 Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2005 06:43:22 +0100 From: Andi Kleen To: Rusty Russell Cc: Andi Kleen , Andrew Morton , manpreet@fabric7.com, lkml - Kernel Mailing List , discuss@x86-64.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] i386/x86-64: Fix timer SMP bootup race Message-ID: <20050117054322.GD19187@wotan.suse.de> References: <20050115040951.GC13525@wotan.suse.de> <1105929264.3954.2.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1105929264.3954.2.camel@localhost.localdomain> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jan 17, 2005 at 01:34:24PM +1100, Rusty Russell wrote: > On Sat, 2005-01-15 at 05:09 +0100, Andi Kleen wrote: > > Fix boot up SMP race in timer setup on i386/x86-64. > > How's this? Didn't do x86-64, but tested on i386. Looks ok to me. You're right that the commenced check should do the necessary synchronization before the idle loop is entered. -Andi