public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Juho Snellman <jsnell@iki.fi>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: x86-64: int3 no longer causes SIGTRAP in 2.6.10
Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2005 03:12:45 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050118011244.GA23256@iki.fi> (raw)

2.6.10 changed the behaviour of the int3 instruction on x86-64. It
used to result in a SIGTRAP, now it's a SIGSEGV in both native and
32-bit legacy modes. This was apparently caused by the kprobe port,
specifically this part:

--- a/arch/x86_64/kernel/traps.c        2004-12-24 13:36:17 -08:00
+++ b/arch/x86_64/kernel/traps.c        2004-12-24 13:36:17 -08:00
@@ -862,8 +910,8 @@
        set_intr_gate(0,&divide_error);
        set_intr_gate_ist(1,&debug,DEBUG_STACK);
        set_intr_gate_ist(2,&nmi,NMI_STACK);
-       set_system_gate(3,&int3);       /* int3-5 can be called from all */
-       set_system_gate(4,&overflow);
+       set_intr_gate(3,&int3);
+       set_system_gate(4,&overflow);   /* int4-5 can be called from all */

Was effectively disabling int3 a conscious decision, or just an
unintended side-effect? This breaks at least Steel Bank Common Lisp
(x86 and x86-64) and CMU Common Lisp (x86), which use int3 for error
traps and breakpoints.

Simple test case:

% cat foo.c  
int main (void) {
    asm("int3");
    return 0;
}
% gcc -o foo foo.c
% ./foo
zsh: trace trap  ./foo
% gcc -m32 -o foo-32 foo.c
% ./foo-32
zsh: trace trap  ./foo-32

[ reboot ]

% uname -a
Linux kiki 2.6.10 #2 Sun Dec 26 04:54:05 EET 2004 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64
% ./foo
zsh: segmentation fault  ./foo
% ./foo-32
zsh: segmentation fault  ./foo-32

-- 
Juho Snellman

             reply	other threads:[~2005-01-18  1:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-01-18  1:12 Juho Snellman [this message]
2005-01-18  1:47 ` x86-64: int3 no longer causes SIGTRAP in 2.6.10 Andi Kleen
2005-01-18  8:49   ` Prasanna S Panchamukhi
2005-01-18  8:52     ` Andi Kleen
2005-01-19 11:36       ` Prasanna S Panchamukhi
2005-01-19 12:19         ` Andi Kleen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20050118011244.GA23256@iki.fi \
    --to=jsnell@iki.fi \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox