From: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
To: Andrea Arcangeli <andrea@suse.de>
Cc: Pavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz>, George Anzinger <george@mvista.com>,
john stultz <johnstul@us.ibm.com>,
Zwane Mwaikambo <zwane@arm.linux.org.uk>,
Con Kolivas <kernel@kolivas.org>,
Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dynamic tick patch
Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2005 11:34:20 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050119193419.GH14545@atomide.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050119191731.GG14545@atomide.com>
* Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> [050119 11:20]:
> * Andrea Arcangeli <andrea@suse.de> [050119 11:12]:
> > On Wed, Jan 19, 2005 at 10:19:47AM -0800, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> > > If you have a chance, can you please provide me with some more info
> > > on your system, see my recent reply to Pavel in this thread for the
> >
> > It's a normal UP athlon 1ghz, it should be quite widespread hardware.
> > I know at least another system that had the problem of system time going
> > in the future with 2.6 at the same rate of mine. Still it could be an
> > hardware issue after all if nobody else can reproduce it. At HZ=100 the
> > system time is again perfectly accurate like in 2.4, so probably at least
> > the PIT is ok.
>
> I've tested it with a celeron a300 box, tyan s2460 dual athlon,
> tyan tiger 100 dual p3, and fujitsu p1110 crusoe laptop. Fujitsu I
> may not have tested with TSC, but others work with both ACPI PM
> timer and TSC.
>
> Maybe try disabling or enabling ACPI PM timer? Or maybe it does not
> use TSC or ACPI PM timer, and that there's some bug in my patch that
> kills the plain PIT timer?
It could be HPET that kills it. I don't have any boxes with HPET
timer, can you try without HPET?
Tony
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-01-19 19:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 60+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-01-19 0:05 [PATCH] dynamic tick patch Tony Lindgren
2005-01-19 0:22 ` Lee Revell
2005-01-19 1:04 ` Tony Lindgren
2005-01-19 4:21 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2005-01-19 5:07 ` Tony Lindgren
2005-01-19 5:21 ` Tony Lindgren
2005-01-19 5:44 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2005-01-19 6:26 ` Tony Lindgren
2005-01-19 9:45 ` Pavel Machek
2005-01-19 5:28 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2005-01-19 6:37 ` Tony Lindgren
2005-01-19 7:08 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2005-01-19 7:31 ` Tony Lindgren
2005-01-19 14:11 ` Stephen Frost
2005-01-19 17:17 ` Tony Lindgren
[not found] ` <OFDC470564.D4624EB3-ON41256F8E.00512848-41256F8E.005428CC@de.ibm.com>
2005-01-19 17:37 ` Tony Lindgren
2005-01-19 9:43 ` Pavel Machek
2005-01-19 17:13 ` Tony Lindgren
2005-01-19 17:48 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2005-01-19 18:19 ` Tony Lindgren
2005-01-19 19:12 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2005-01-19 19:17 ` Tony Lindgren
2005-01-19 19:34 ` Tony Lindgren [this message]
2005-01-19 22:42 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2005-01-19 22:59 ` George Anzinger
2005-01-19 23:17 ` Tony Lindgren
2005-01-20 0:24 ` George Anzinger
2005-01-20 8:04 ` Tony Lindgren
2005-01-20 23:10 ` George Anzinger
2005-01-21 17:35 ` Tony Lindgren
2005-01-21 20:23 ` George Anzinger
2005-01-19 23:26 ` Thomas Gleixner
2005-01-19 23:45 ` john stultz
2005-01-20 5:56 ` Thomas Gleixner
2005-01-20 0:39 ` George Anzinger
2005-01-20 3:15 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2005-01-19 11:36 ` Pavel Machek
2005-01-19 17:11 ` Tony Lindgren
2005-01-19 17:30 ` Arjan van de Ven
2005-01-19 17:41 ` Tony Lindgren
2005-01-19 22:06 ` Pavel Machek
2005-01-19 23:08 ` Tony Lindgren
2005-01-19 23:46 ` Pavel Machek
2005-01-19 23:53 ` Tony Lindgren
2005-01-19 23:59 ` Pavel Machek
2005-01-20 0:07 ` Tony Lindgren
2005-01-20 0:44 ` Pavel Machek
2005-01-20 0:54 ` Pavel Machek
2005-01-20 7:39 ` Tony Lindgren
2005-01-19 22:20 ` Pavel Machek
2005-01-20 4:02 ` Zwane Mwaikambo
2005-01-21 17:48 ` Tony Lindgren
2005-01-21 18:27 ` Zwane Mwaikambo
2005-01-21 18:38 ` Tony Lindgren
2005-01-21 18:54 ` Pavel Machek
2005-01-21 21:23 ` Zwane Mwaikambo
2005-01-21 21:29 ` Pavel Machek
2005-01-21 20:25 ` George Anzinger
2005-01-21 21:38 ` Zwane Mwaikambo
2005-01-22 7:24 ` George Anzinger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050119193419.GH14545@atomide.com \
--to=tony@atomide.com \
--cc=andrea@suse.de \
--cc=george@mvista.com \
--cc=johnstul@us.ibm.com \
--cc=kernel@kolivas.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pavel@suse.cz \
--cc=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
--cc=zwane@arm.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox