public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [patch] minor spinlock cleanups
Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2005 13:22:54 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050120122254.GA6297@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050120121813.GA4838@elte.hu>


cleanup: remove stale semicolon from linux/spinlock.h and stale space
from asm-i386/spinlock.h.

	Ingo

Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>

--- linux/include/linux/spinlock.h.orig
+++ linux/include/linux/spinlock.h
@@ -202,7 +202,7 @@ typedef struct {
 #define _raw_spin_lock(lock)	do { (void)(lock); } while(0)
 #define spin_is_locked(lock)	((void)(lock), 0)
 #define _raw_spin_trylock(lock)	(((void)(lock), 1))
-#define spin_unlock_wait(lock)	(void)(lock);
+#define spin_unlock_wait(lock)	(void)(lock)
 #define _raw_spin_unlock(lock) do { (void)(lock); } while(0)
 #endif /* CONFIG_DEBUG_SPINLOCK */
 
--- linux/include/asm-i386/spinlock.h.orig
+++ linux/include/asm-i386/spinlock.h
@@ -92,7 +92,7 @@ static inline void spin_unlock_wait(spin
  * (except on PPro SMP or if we are using OOSTORE)
  * (PPro errata 66, 92)
  */
- 
+
 #if !defined(CONFIG_X86_OOSTORE) && !defined(CONFIG_X86_PPRO_FENCE)
 
 #define spin_unlock_string \

  reply	other threads:[~2005-01-20 12:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-01-20 11:43 [patch 1/3] spinlock fix #1 Ingo Molnar
2005-01-20 11:59 ` [patch 2/3] spinlock fix #2: generalize [spin|rw]lock yielding Ingo Molnar
2005-01-20 12:09   ` [patch 3/3] spinlock fix #3: type-checking spinlock primitives, x86 Ingo Molnar
2005-01-20 12:18     ` [patch] stricter type-checking rwlock " Ingo Molnar
2005-01-20 12:22       ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2005-01-20 22:51     ` [patch 3/3] spinlock fix #3: type-checking spinlock " J.A. Magallon
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-01-19 21:43 Horrible regression with -CURRENT from "Don't busy-lock-loop in preemptable spinlocks" patch Paul Mackerras
2005-01-20  2:34 ` [PATCH RFC] 'spinlock/rwlock fixes' V3 [1/1] Chris Wedgwood
2005-01-20  3:01   ` Andrew Morton
2005-01-20  3:18     ` Chris Wedgwood
2005-01-20  8:59       ` Peter Chubb
2005-01-20 15:51         ` Linus Torvalds
2005-01-20 16:08           ` [patch 1/3] spinlock fix #1, *_can_lock() primitives Ingo Molnar
2005-01-20 16:11             ` [patch 2/3] spinlock fix #2: generalize [spin|rw]lock yielding Ingo Molnar
2005-01-20 16:12               ` [patch 3/3] spinlock fix #3: type-checking spinlock primitives, x86 Ingo Molnar
2005-01-20 16:14                 ` [patch] stricter type-checking rwlock " Ingo Molnar
2005-01-20 16:16                   ` [patch] minor spinlock cleanups Ingo Molnar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20050120122254.GA6297@elte.hu \
    --to=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox