public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Cc: Peter Chubb <peterc@gelato.unsw.edu.au>,
	Chris Wedgwood <cw@f00f.org>, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
	paulus@samba.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	tony.luck@intel.com, dsw@gelato.unsw.edu.au,
	benh@kernel.crashing.org, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org,
	hch@infradead.org, wli@holomorphy.com, jbarnes@sgi.com
Subject: [patch] stricter type-checking rwlock primitives, x86
Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2005 17:14:50 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050120161450.GC13812@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050120161259.GB13812@elte.hu>


[patch respun with s/trylock_test/can_lock/]
--

turn x86 rwlock macros into inline functions, to get stricter
type-checking. Test-built/booted on x86. (patch comes after all
previous spinlock patches.)

	Ingo

Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>

--- linux/include/asm-i386/spinlock.h.orig
+++ linux/include/asm-i386/spinlock.h
@@ -198,21 +198,33 @@ typedef struct {
 
 #define RW_LOCK_UNLOCKED (rwlock_t) { RW_LOCK_BIAS RWLOCK_MAGIC_INIT }
 
-#define rwlock_init(x)	do { *(x) = RW_LOCK_UNLOCKED; } while(0)
+static inline void rwlock_init(rwlock_t *rw)
+{
+	*rw = RW_LOCK_UNLOCKED;
+}
 
-#define rwlock_is_locked(x) ((x)->lock != RW_LOCK_BIAS)
+static inline int rwlock_is_locked(rwlock_t *rw)
+{
+	return rw->lock != RW_LOCK_BIAS;
+}
 
 /**
  * read_can_lock - would read_trylock() succeed?
  * @lock: the rwlock in question.
  */
-#define read_can_lock(x) (atomic_read((atomic_t *)&(x)->lock) > 0)
+static inline int read_can_lock(rwlock_t *rw)
+{
+	return atomic_read((atomic_t *)&rw->lock) > 0;
+}
 
 /**
  * write_can_lock - would write_trylock() succeed?
  * @lock: the rwlock in question.
  */
-#define write_can_lock(x) ((x)->lock == RW_LOCK_BIAS)
+static inline int write_can_lock(rwlock_t *rw)
+{
+	return atomic_read((atomic_t *)&rw->lock) == RW_LOCK_BIAS;
+}
 
 /*
  * On x86, we implement read-write locks as a 32-bit counter
@@ -241,8 +253,16 @@ static inline void _raw_write_lock(rwloc
 	__build_write_lock(rw, "__write_lock_failed");
 }
 
-#define _raw_read_unlock(rw)		asm volatile("lock ; incl %0" :"=m" ((rw)->lock) : : "memory")
-#define _raw_write_unlock(rw)	asm volatile("lock ; addl $" RW_LOCK_BIAS_STR ",%0":"=m" ((rw)->lock) : : "memory")
+static inline void _raw_read_unlock(rwlock_t *rw)
+{
+	asm volatile("lock ; incl %0" :"=m" (rw->lock) : : "memory");
+}
+
+static inline void _raw_write_unlock(rwlock_t *rw)
+{
+	asm volatile("lock ; addl $" RW_LOCK_BIAS_STR
+				",%0":"=m" (rw->lock) : : "memory");
+}
 
 static inline int _raw_read_trylock(rwlock_t *lock)
 {

  reply	other threads:[~2005-01-20 16:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 49+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-01-17  5:50 Horrible regression with -CURRENT from "Don't busy-lock-loop in preemptable spinlocks" patch Chris Wedgwood
2005-01-17  7:09 ` Andrew Morton
2005-01-17  7:33   ` Chris Wedgwood
2005-01-17  7:50     ` Paul Mackerras
2005-01-17  8:00       ` Chris Wedgwood
2005-01-17 14:33   ` Ingo Molnar
2005-01-18  1:47     ` Darren Williams
2005-01-18  4:28       ` Darren Williams
2005-01-18  7:08         ` Chris Wedgwood
2005-01-19  0:14       ` Peter Chubb
2005-01-19  8:04         ` Ingo Molnar
2005-01-19  9:18           ` Peter Chubb
2005-01-19  9:20             ` Ingo Molnar
2005-01-19 21:43               ` Paul Mackerras
2005-01-20  2:34                 ` [PATCH RFC] 'spinlock/rwlock fixes' V3 [1/1] Chris Wedgwood
2005-01-20  3:01                   ` Andrew Morton
2005-01-20  3:18                     ` Chris Wedgwood
2005-01-20  3:33                       ` Andrew Morton
2005-01-20  8:59                       ` Peter Chubb
2005-01-20 13:04                         ` Ingo Molnar
2005-01-20 15:51                         ` Linus Torvalds
2005-01-20 16:08                           ` [patch 1/3] spinlock fix #1, *_can_lock() primitives Ingo Molnar
2005-01-20 16:11                             ` [patch 2/3] spinlock fix #2: generalize [spin|rw]lock yielding Ingo Molnar
2005-01-20 16:12                               ` [patch 3/3] spinlock fix #3: type-checking spinlock primitives, x86 Ingo Molnar
2005-01-20 16:14                                 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2005-01-20 16:16                                   ` [patch] minor spinlock cleanups Ingo Molnar
2005-01-20 16:31                             ` [patch 1/3] spinlock fix #1, *_can_lock() primitives Linus Torvalds
2005-01-20 16:40                               ` Ingo Molnar
2005-01-20 17:48                                 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-01-20 17:53                                   ` Ingo Molnar
2005-01-20 18:22                                     ` [patch, BK-curr] nonintrusive spin-polling loop in kernel/spinlock.c Ingo Molnar
2005-01-20 18:25                                       ` [patch, BK-curr] rename 'lock' to 'slock' in asm-i386/spinlock.h Ingo Molnar
2005-01-20 23:45                                       ` [patch, BK-curr] nonintrusive spin-polling loop in kernel/spinlock.c Linus Torvalds
2005-01-20 16:44                               ` [patch 1/3] spinlock fix #1, *_can_lock() primitives Ingo Molnar
2005-01-20 16:59                                 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-01-20 16:47                               ` Ingo Molnar
2005-01-20 16:57                               ` Ingo Molnar
2005-01-20 16:05                       ` [PATCH RFC] 'spinlock/rwlock fixes' V3 [1/1] Linus Torvalds
2005-01-20 16:20                         ` Ingo Molnar
2005-01-20 16:18                   ` Linus Torvalds
2005-01-20 16:23                     ` Ingo Molnar
2005-01-20 17:30                       ` Linus Torvalds
2005-01-20 17:38                         ` Ingo Molnar
2005-01-20 16:28                     ` Ingo Molnar
2005-01-20  5:49                 ` Horrible regression with -CURRENT from "Don't busy-lock-loop in preemptable spinlocks" patch Grant Grundler
2005-01-17  7:38 ` [PATCH] __get_cpu_var should use __smp_processor_id() not smp_processor_id() Chris Wedgwood
2005-01-17 14:40   ` Ingo Molnar
2005-01-17 18:53     ` Chris Wedgwood
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-01-20 11:43 [patch 1/3] spinlock fix #1 Ingo Molnar
2005-01-20 11:59 ` [patch 2/3] spinlock fix #2: generalize [spin|rw]lock yielding Ingo Molnar
2005-01-20 12:09   ` [patch 3/3] spinlock fix #3: type-checking spinlock primitives, x86 Ingo Molnar
2005-01-20 12:18     ` [patch] stricter type-checking rwlock " Ingo Molnar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20050120161450.GC13812@elte.hu \
    --to=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=cw@f00f.org \
    --cc=dsw@gelato.unsw.edu.au \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=jbarnes@sgi.com \
    --cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    --cc=peterc@gelato.unsw.edu.au \
    --cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
    --cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
    --cc=wli@holomorphy.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox