public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
To: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
Cc: John Mock <kd6pag@qsl.net>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.6.11-rc1 vs. PowerMac 8500/G3 (and VAIO laptop) [usb-storage oops]
Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2005 00:42:04 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050121084204.GA20397@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1106295136.783.47.camel@baythorne.infradead.org>

On Fri, Jan 21, 2005 at 08:12:16AM +0000, David Woodhouse wrote:
> On Thu, 2005-01-20 at 23:58 -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> > Well, we should be byteswapping all of the fields that need to be
> > swapped, right?  I'm guessing that userspace is expecting the fields
> > to be in cpu endian, correct?
> 
> Userspace varies in that. Nobody expects _all_ the fields to be swapped;
> the kernel only ever swapped those four. And in fact lsusb from the
> stock usbutils expects it to be consistently little-endian. John's
> version seems to be hacked to expect just those four fields to be host-
> endian, while the rest remains little-endian.
> 
> We have a choice here -- we can preserve the ABI by continuing to be
> stupidly inconsistent about endianness, or you can revert my patch and
> stock usbutils can be correct.

Let's preserve the ABI, that's the safest thing to do.

> > But if you want, I'll gladly revert your patch, as I don't have a ppc
> > box to test this out on.
> 
> I'd revert it.

Done.

thanks,

greg k-h

  reply	other threads:[~2005-01-21  8:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-01-19 23:39 2.6.11-rc1 vs. PowerMac 8500/G3 (and VAIO laptop) [usb-storage oops] John Mock
2005-01-20  8:40 ` David Woodhouse
2005-01-21  0:08   ` Greg KH
2005-01-21  7:49     ` David Woodhouse
2005-01-21  7:58       ` Greg KH
2005-01-21  8:12         ` David Woodhouse
2005-01-21  8:42           ` Greg KH [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-01-20 18:29 John Mock

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20050121084204.GA20397@kroah.com \
    --to=greg@kroah.com \
    --cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
    --cc=kd6pag@qsl.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox