From: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
To: Andrea Arcangeli <andrea@cpushare.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Chris Wright <chrisw@osdl.org>,
Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: seccomp for 2.6.11-rc1-bk8
Date: Sun, 23 Jan 2005 01:07:04 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050123000703.GC21719@elf.ucw.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050122233418.GH7587@dualathlon.random>
Hi!
> > Well, then you can help auditing ptrace()... It is probably also true
> > that more people audited ptrace() than seccomp :-).
>
> Why should I spend time auditing ptrace when I have a superior solution
> that doesn't require me any auditing at all? I've an huge pile of
> work,
Adding code is easy, but in the long term would lead to maintainance
nightmare. Adding seccomp code that does subset of ptrace, just
because ptrace audit is lot of work, seems like a wrong thing to
do. Sorry.
Pavel
--
People were complaining that M$ turns users into beta-testers...
...jr ghea gurz vagb qrirybcref, naq gurl frrz gb yvxr vg gung jnl!
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-01-23 0:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-01-21 10:06 seccomp for 2.6.11-rc1-bk8 Andrea Arcangeli
2005-01-21 12:03 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-01-21 12:47 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-01-21 12:55 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-01-21 21:31 ` Roland McGrath
2005-01-22 3:25 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2005-01-21 20:24 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2005-01-21 17:39 ` Chris Wright
2005-01-21 18:39 ` Rik van Riel
2005-01-21 18:50 ` Chris Wright
2005-01-21 19:55 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-01-21 20:34 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2005-01-21 20:54 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-01-22 2:51 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2005-01-22 10:32 ` Pavel Machek
2005-01-22 17:25 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2005-01-22 19:42 ` Pavel Machek
2005-01-22 23:34 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2005-01-23 0:07 ` Pavel Machek [this message]
2005-01-23 0:46 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2005-01-23 0:43 ` Rik van Riel
2005-01-23 0:52 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2005-01-23 4:43 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2005-01-23 6:11 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2005-01-21 18:59 ` David Wagner
2005-01-21 19:17 ` Chris Wright
2005-01-23 7:34 ` David Wagner
2005-01-24 15:10 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-02-15 9:25 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2005-02-25 19:01 ` David Wagner
2005-01-21 12:11 ` Pavel Machek
2005-02-15 9:32 ` seccomp for 2.6.11-rc4 Andrea Arcangeli
2005-02-16 5:25 ` Herbert Poetzl
2005-02-18 2:25 ` Andrea Arcangeli
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050123000703.GC21719@elf.ucw.cz \
--to=pavel@ucw.cz \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=andrea@cpushare.com \
--cc=chrisw@osdl.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox