From: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
To: Russell King <rmk+lkml@arm.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Robert.Olsson@data.slu.se, akpm@osdl.org, torvalds@osdl.org,
alexn@dsv.su.se, kas@fi.muni.cz, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
netdev@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: Memory leak in 2.6.11-rc1?
Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2005 12:33:26 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050127123326.2eafab35.davem@davemloft.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050127164918.C3036@flint.arm.linux.org.uk>
On Thu, 27 Jan 2005 16:49:18 +0000
Russell King <rmk+lkml@arm.linux.org.uk> wrote:
> notice how /proc/net/stat/rt_cache says there's 1336 entries in the
> route cache. _Where_ are they? They're not there according to
> /proc/net/rt_cache.
When the route cache is flushed, that kills a reference to each
entry in the routing cache. If for some reason, other references
remain (route connected to socket, some leak in the stack somewhere)
the route cache entry can't be immediately completely freed up.
So they won't be listed in /proc/net/rt_cache (since they've been
removed from the lookup table) but they will be accounted for in
/proc/net/stat/rt_cache until the final release is done on the
routing cache object and it can be completely freed up.
Do you happen to be using IPV6 in any way by chance?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-01-27 20:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 87+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-01-21 16:19 Memory leak in 2.6.11-rc1? Jan Kasprzak
2005-01-22 2:23 ` Alexander Nyberg
2005-01-23 9:11 ` Jens Axboe
2005-01-23 9:19 ` Andrew Morton
2005-01-23 9:56 ` Jens Axboe
2005-01-23 10:32 ` Andrew Morton
2005-01-23 20:03 ` Russell King
2005-01-24 11:48 ` Russell King
2005-01-25 19:32 ` Russell King
2005-01-27 8:28 ` Russell King
2005-01-27 8:47 ` Andrew Morton
2005-01-27 10:19 ` Alessandro Suardi
2005-01-27 12:17 ` Martin Josefsson
2005-01-27 12:56 ` Robert Olsson
2005-01-27 13:03 ` Robert Olsson
2005-01-27 16:49 ` Russell King
2005-01-27 18:37 ` Phil Oester
2005-01-27 19:25 ` Russell King
2005-01-27 20:40 ` Phil Oester
2005-01-28 9:32 ` Russell King
2005-01-27 20:33 ` David S. Miller [this message]
2005-01-28 0:17 ` Russell King
2005-01-28 0:34 ` David S. Miller
2005-01-28 8:58 ` Russell King
2005-01-30 13:23 ` Russell King
2005-01-30 15:34 ` Russell King
2005-01-30 16:57 ` Phil Oester
2005-01-30 17:23 ` Patrick McHardy
2005-01-30 17:26 ` Patrick McHardy
2005-01-30 17:58 ` Patrick McHardy
2005-01-30 18:45 ` Russell King
2005-01-31 2:48 ` David S. Miller
2005-01-31 4:11 ` Herbert Xu
2005-01-31 4:45 ` YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明
2005-01-31 5:00 ` Patrick McHardy
2005-01-31 5:11 ` David S. Miller
2005-01-31 5:40 ` Herbert Xu
2005-01-31 5:16 ` YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明
2005-01-31 5:42 ` Yasuyuki KOZAKAI
2005-01-30 18:01 ` Russell King
2005-01-30 18:19 ` Phil Oester
2005-01-28 1:41 ` Phil Oester
2005-01-24 0:56 ` Alexander Nyberg
2005-01-24 20:47 ` Jens Axboe
2005-01-24 20:56 ` Andrew Morton
2005-01-24 21:05 ` Jens Axboe
2005-01-24 22:35 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-01-25 15:53 ` OT " Paulo Marques
2005-01-26 8:01 ` Jens Axboe
2005-01-26 8:11 ` Andrew Morton
2005-01-26 8:40 ` Jens Axboe
2005-01-26 8:44 ` Andrew Morton
2005-01-26 8:47 ` Jens Axboe
2005-01-26 8:52 ` Jens Axboe
2005-01-26 9:00 ` William Lee Irwin III
2005-01-26 8:58 ` Andrew Morton
2005-01-26 9:03 ` Jens Axboe
2005-01-26 15:52 ` Parag Warudkar
2005-02-02 9:29 ` Lennert Van Alboom
2005-02-02 16:00 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-02-02 16:19 ` Lennert Van Alboom
2005-02-02 17:49 ` Dave Hansen
2005-02-02 18:27 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-02-02 19:07 ` Dave Hansen
2005-02-02 21:08 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-01-24 22:05 ` Andrew Morton
2005-02-07 11:00 ` Jan Kasprzak
2005-02-07 11:11 ` William Lee Irwin III
2005-02-07 15:38 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-02-07 15:52 ` Jan Kasprzak
2005-02-07 16:38 ` axboe
2005-02-07 17:35 ` Jan Kasprzak
2005-02-07 21:10 ` Jan Kasprzak
2005-02-08 2:47 ` Memory leak in 2.6.11-rc1? (also here) Noel Maddy
2005-02-16 4:00 ` -rc3 leaking NOT BIO [Was: Memory leak in 2.6.11-rc1?] Parag Warudkar
2005-02-16 5:12 ` Andrew Morton
2005-02-16 6:07 ` Parag Warudkar
2005-02-16 23:52 ` Andrew Morton
2005-02-17 13:00 ` Parag Warudkar
2005-02-17 18:18 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-02-18 1:38 ` Badari Pulavarty
2005-02-21 4:57 ` Parag Warudkar
2005-02-16 23:31 ` Parag Warudkar
2005-02-16 23:51 ` Andrew Morton
2005-02-17 1:19 ` Parag Warudkar
2005-02-17 3:48 ` Horst von Brand
2005-02-17 13:35 ` Parag Warudkar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050127123326.2eafab35.davem@davemloft.net \
--to=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=Robert.Olsson@data.slu.se \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=alexn@dsv.su.se \
--cc=kas@fi.muni.cz \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@oss.sgi.com \
--cc=rmk+lkml@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox