From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261499AbVA1Rit (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 Jan 2005 12:38:49 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261495AbVA1Ris (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 Jan 2005 12:38:48 -0500 Received: from ns.suse.de ([195.135.220.2]:53222 "EHLO Cantor.suse.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261499AbVA1Rhe (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 Jan 2005 12:37:34 -0500 Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2005 18:37:23 +0100 From: Olaf Hering To: dtor_core@ameritech.net Cc: Vojtech Pavlik , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org Subject: Re: atkbd_init lockup with 2.6.11-rc1 Message-ID: <20050128173723.GA4169@suse.de> References: <20050128132202.GA27323@suse.de> <20050128135827.GA28784@suse.de> <20050128145511.GA29340@suse.de> <20050128161746.GA1092@suse.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-DOS: I got your 640K Real Mode Right Here Buddy! X-Homeland-Security: You are not supposed to read this line! You are a terrorist! User-Agent: Mutt und vi sind doch schneller als Notes (und GroupWise) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Jan 28, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > On Fri, 28 Jan 2005 11:43:44 -0500, Dmitry Torokhov > wrote: > > This time keyboard does not hang but NAKs everything instead... > > Probably stupid question - does this box have AT keyboard? Or NAKs are > perfectly valid? There is nothing connected. 2.6.10-bk11 works, -bk12 not. Thats a starting point, will look at the differences now.