From: Marcelo Tosatti <marcelo.tosatti@cyclades.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Matthias Koerber <simakoer@cip.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>,
scott.feldman@intel.com, ganesh.venkatesan@intel.com
Subject: Re: 2.4.29, e100 and a WOL packet causes keventd going mad
Date: Sat, 29 Jan 2005 16:18:21 -0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050129181821.GA2128@logos.cnet> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050128164811.GA8022@cip.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
On Fri, Jan 28, 2005 at 05:48:11PM +0100, Michael Gernoth wrote:
> Hi,
>
> we have about 70 P4 uniprocessor machines (some with Hyperthreading
> capable CPUs) running linux 2.4.29, which are woken up on the weekdays
> by sending a WOL packet to them. The machines all have a E100 nic with
> WOL enabled in the bios. The E100 driver is compiled into the kernel
> and not loaded as a module.
>
> If the machine which should be woken up is already running (because
> someone switched it on by hand), the WOL packet causes keventd to go
> mad and "use" 100% CPU:
>
> PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND
> 2 root 15 0 0 0 0 R 99.9 0.0 140:50.94 keventd
Probably a task event is rescheduling itself repeatedly? e100 does not seem
to schedule_task() events directly, so I wonder what is going on.
Can you boot a machine with profile=2, then send the WOL packet causing
keventd to go mad and run:
readprofile | sort -nr +2 | head -20
After a few minutes.
Ganesh, Scott, Jeff, any ideas?
> This can be reproduced on any of the 70 machines by simply sending a WOL
> packet to it, when it's already running... No entry is made in the
> kernel log.
>
> The dmesg of an affected machine can be found at:
> http://wwwcip.informatik.uni-erlangen.de/~simigern/cip-dmesg
> Our kernel-config is at:
> http://wwwcip.informatik.uni-erlangen.de/~simigern/cip-generic-config
> lspci -vvv is at:
> http://wwwcip.informatik.uni-erlangen.de/~simigern/cip-lspci
>
> We are using a kernel.org linux 2.4.29 kernel patched with the current
> autofs patch and ACL support.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-01-30 1:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-01-28 16:48 2.4.29, e100 and a WOL packet causes keventd going mad Michael Gernoth
2005-01-28 18:53 ` Bukie Mabayoje
2005-01-28 18:54 ` Michael Gernoth
2005-01-28 20:05 ` Bukie Mabayoje
2005-01-30 0:13 ` Bukie Mabayoje
2005-01-29 18:18 ` Marcelo Tosatti [this message]
2005-01-30 12:15 ` Michael Gernoth
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-01-30 17:18 David Härdeman
2005-01-31 3:47 ` Scott Feldman
2005-01-31 3:58 ` Nigel Cunningham
2005-01-31 5:00 ` Scott Feldman
2005-01-31 6:14 ` Nigel Cunningham
2005-01-31 9:08 ` Nigel Cunningham
2005-01-31 4:23 ` Bukie Mabayoje
2005-01-31 15:24 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2005-01-31 20:29 ` David Härdeman
2005-01-31 21:13 ` Bukie Mabayoje
2005-01-31 19:26 Brandeburg, Jesse
2005-01-31 20:57 ` Bukie Mabayoje
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050129181821.GA2128@logos.cnet \
--to=marcelo.tosatti@cyclades.com \
--cc=ganesh.venkatesan@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=scott.feldman@intel.com \
--cc=simakoer@cip.informatik.uni-erlangen.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox