Re: [PATCH][I2C] Marvell mv64xxx i2c driver

[Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>]

On Mon, Jan 31, 2005 at 11:41:28AM -0700, Mark A. Greer wrote:
> Greg KH wrote:
> 
> >On Tue, Jan 25, 2005 at 06:26:45PM -0700, Mark A. Greer wrote:
> > 
> >
> >>+static inline void
> >>+mv64xxx_i2c_fsm(struct mv64xxx_i2c_data *drv_data, u32 status)
> >>   
> >>
> >
> >This is a much too big of a function to be "inline".  Please change it.
> >Same for your other inline functions, that's not really needed, right?
> >
> > 
> >
> >>+{
> >>+	pr_debug("mv64xxx_i2c_fsm: ENTER--state: %d, status: 0x%x\n",
> >>+		drv_data->state, status);
> >>   
> >>
> >
> >Please use the dev_* calls instead.  It gives you an accurate
> >description of the specific device that emits the messages.  Also use it
> >for all of the printk() calls in the driver too.
> >
> >thanks,
> >
> >greg k-h
> >
> 
> Certainly.  I already posted this [incremental] patch based on your 
> previous comments, 
> http://www.ussg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0501.3/0941.html.  Is that 
> better?

How about a whole new patch that I could apply?  That would be better :)

thanks,

greg k-h