From: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
To: Mitch Williams <mitch.a.williams@intel.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] buffer writes to sysfs
Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2005 22:30:24 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050201063024.GA15179@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.CYG.4.58.0501251519390.2388@mawilli1-desk2.amr.corp.intel.com>
On Tue, Jan 25, 2005 at 03:39:00PM -0800, Mitch Williams wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, 24 Jan 2005, Greg KH wrote:
> >
> > Who is trying to send > 1K to a sysfs file? Remember, sysfs files are
> > for 1 value only. If you consider > 1K a "single value" please point me
> > to that part of the kernel that does that.
> >
> > > To the typical user, there's really no difference in behavior, unless
> > you
> > > are writing a ton of data into the file. Of course, there's the
> > obvious
> > > question of why you'd want to do so...
> >
> > Exactly, you should not be doing that anyway. So, because of that, I
> > really don't want/like this patch.
>
>
> OK, I've had a day to think about this, and I think I have a good answer
> now.
>
> Leaving aside the issue of how big a 'single object' is, we still have to
> consider the possibility that a user _will_ indeed someday try to write 4K
> (or more) to a sysfs file. It's just going to happen. And right now, the
> kernel's behavior in that event is unpredictable, because we don't know
> how the c library is going to buffer this write.
That's your C library, probably not mine :)
Anyway, sure, I can see that we want to handle this in a sane manner.
> diff -urpN -X dontdiff linux-2.6.11-clean/fs/sysfs/file.c linux-2.6.11/fs/sysfs/file.c
> --- linux-2.6.11-clean/fs/sysfs/file.c 2004-12-24 13:33:50.000000000 -0800
> +++ linux-2.6.11/fs/sysfs/file.c 2005-01-25 10:47:15.000000000 -0800
> @@ -232,6 +232,8 @@ sysfs_write_file(struct file *file, cons
> {
> struct sysfs_buffer * buffer = file->private_data;
>
> + if (*ppos > 0)
> + return -EIO;
> down(&buffer->sem);
> count = fill_write_buffer(buffer,buf,count);
> if (count > 0)
You are using spaces instead of tabs :(
Care to redo it?
thanks,
greg k-h
prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-02-01 7:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-01-21 22:52 [PATCH 2/3] buffer writes to sysfs Mitch Williams
2005-01-22 8:09 ` Greg KH
2005-01-24 18:37 ` Mitch Williams
2005-01-24 21:39 ` Greg KH
2005-01-25 23:39 ` Mitch Williams
2005-01-27 18:28 ` Bill Davidsen
2005-02-01 6:30 ` Greg KH [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050201063024.GA15179@kroah.com \
--to=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mitch.a.williams@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox