From: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
To: Linux Kernel List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: I2C algorithm IDs
Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2005 23:19:03 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050201071903.GG20783@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050122174718.A27993@flint.arm.linux.org.uk>
On Sat, Jan 22, 2005 at 05:47:18PM +0000, Russell King wrote:
> Greg,
>
> Are I2C algorithm IDs supposed to be unique? Do they have any meaning in
> reality at all? If the answer is yes to either of these questions, the
> following should probably be resolved:
Yes, they are used in some places, and yes they do need to be unique.
> #define I2C_ALGO_PCA 0x150000 /* PCA 9564 style adapters */
> #define I2C_ALGO_SIBYTE 0x150000 /* Broadcom SiByte SOCs */
Thanks for pointing this out, I've gone and fixed this up and will send
the patch upward.
thanks,
greg k-h
prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-02-01 7:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-01-22 17:47 I2C algorithm IDs Russell King
2005-02-01 7:19 ` Greg KH [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050201071903.GG20783@kroah.com \
--to=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox