public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
To: Lee Revell <rlrevell@joe-job.com>
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
	Pavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz>,
	Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>,
	Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>,
	Andrea Arcangeli <andrea@suse.de>,
	George Anzinger <george@mvista.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	john stultz <johnstul@us.ibm.com>,
	Zwane Mwaikambo <zwane@arm.linux.org.uk>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Dynamic tick, version 050127-1
Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2005 15:42:45 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050201234244.GM14274@atomide.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1107289206.18349.16.camel@krustophenia.net>

* Lee Revell <rlrevell@joe-job.com> [050201 12:20]:
> On Thu, 2005-01-27 at 13:29 -0800, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> > Hi all,
> > 
> > Thanks for all the comments, here's an updated version of the dynamic
> > tick patch.
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I was wondering how Windows handles high res timers, if at all.  The
> reason I ask is because I have been reverse engineering a Windows ASIO
> driver, and I find that if the latency is set below about 5ms, by
> examining the kernel timer queue with SoftICE I can see that several
> kernel timers with 1ms period are created.  (Presumably the sound card's
> interval timer is used for longer periods).
> 
> But, I have seen people mention in the "singing capacitor" threads on
> this list that Windows uses 100 for HZ.
> 
> So, how do they implement 1ms timers with a 10ms tick rate?  Does
> Windows dynamically reprogram the PIT as well?

No idea, but it would probably show up by adding some debug code
some an emulator like Bochs?

Tony

  reply	other threads:[~2005-02-01 23:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-01-27 21:29 [PATCH] Dynamic tick, version 050127-1 Tony Lindgren
2005-01-27 21:50 ` Tony Lindgren
2005-02-01 11:00 ` Pavel Machek
2005-02-01 20:40   ` Tony Lindgren
2005-02-01 21:25     ` Pavel Machek
2005-02-01 23:03       ` Tony Lindgren
2005-02-02 13:50         ` Pavel Machek
2005-02-02 13:50         ` Pavel Machek
2005-02-02 13:56         ` Pavel Machek
2005-02-02 14:11         ` Pavel Machek
2005-02-03  3:04           ` Tony Lindgren
2005-02-03 10:56             ` Pavel Machek
2005-02-03 16:43               ` Tony Lindgren
2005-02-04  5:19                 ` Tony Lindgren
2005-02-04  6:33                   ` Zwane Mwaikambo
2005-02-04 17:18                     ` Tony Lindgren
2005-02-04 17:31                       ` Zwane Mwaikambo
2005-02-04 17:42                         ` Tony Lindgren
2005-02-04 17:54                           ` Zwane Mwaikambo
2005-02-04 18:58                             ` Tony Lindgren
2005-02-04 19:24                               ` Tony Lindgren
2005-02-05 23:00                   ` Pavel Machek
2005-02-06  2:33                     ` Tony Lindgren
2005-02-06  3:54                       ` Tony Lindgren
2005-02-06  8:41                         ` Pavel Machek
2005-02-06  8:50                         ` Pavel Machek
2005-02-06 17:07                           ` Tony Lindgren
2005-02-06 12:15                         ` Pavel Machek
2005-02-06 17:08                           ` Tony Lindgren
2005-02-06  8:11                       ` Pavel Machek
2005-02-06  8:53                         ` Lee Revell
2005-02-06 10:25                           ` Pavel Machek
2005-02-07 22:08                             ` George Anzinger
2005-02-06 17:10                         ` Tony Lindgren
2005-02-06 18:34                           ` Pavel Machek
2005-02-01 20:20 ` Lee Revell
2005-02-01 23:42   ` Tony Lindgren [this message]
2005-02-02  1:06   ` Eric St-Laurent

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20050201234244.GM14274@atomide.com \
    --to=tony@atomide.com \
    --cc=andrea@suse.de \
    --cc=arjan@infradead.org \
    --cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=george@mvista.com \
    --cc=johnstul@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pavel@suse.cz \
    --cc=rlrevell@joe-job.com \
    --cc=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=zwane@arm.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox