public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vojtech Pavlik <vojtech@suse.cz>
To: Peter Osterlund <petero2@telia.com>
Cc: Pete Zaitcev <zaitcev@redhat.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dtor_core@ameritech.net
Subject: Re: Touchpad problems with 2.6.11-rc2
Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2005 07:46:45 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050203064645.GA2342@ucw.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0502022345320.18555@telia.com>

On Wed, Feb 02, 2005 at 11:58:05PM +0100, Peter Osterlund wrote:

> In practice I don't think it will make any significant difference. What
> the code should do depends on what you want to happen if you move the
> mouse pointer 1/2 pixel with one finger stroke, then move it another 1/2
> pixel with a second stroke. The patch I posted will move the pointer one
> pixel in this case and your code will move it 0 pixels. (The X driver does
> not reset the fractions, but that doesn't of course mean that it's the
> only right thing to do.)
> 
> > Also, I think the extra unary minus is uncoth.
> 
> The code was written like that to emphasize the fact that X and Y use the
> same formula, with the only difference that the kernel Y axis is mirrored
> compared to the touchpad Y axis.
> 
> It didn't make any difference for the generated assembly code though,
> using gcc 3.4.2 from Fedora Core 3.
> 
> > +	enum {  FRACTION_DENOM = 100 };
> 
> The enum is much nicer than my #define.

OK. I like this patch, too. Can you guys send me a final version
incorporating the changes of you both for inclusion in the input tree?

-- 
Vojtech Pavlik
SuSE Labs, SuSE CR

  reply	other threads:[~2005-02-03  6:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 52+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-01-24  3:01 Touchpad problems with 2.6.11-rc2 Pete Zaitcev
2005-01-30 11:10 ` Peter Osterlund
2005-01-31 23:15   ` Pete Zaitcev
2005-02-01  3:40     ` Dmitry Torokhov
2005-02-01  5:06       ` Pete Zaitcev
2005-02-01  5:14         ` Dmitry Torokhov
2005-02-03 11:18           ` Giuseppe Bilotta
2005-02-02  7:41   ` Pete Zaitcev
2005-02-02 10:20     ` Vojtech Pavlik
2005-02-02 15:51       ` Dmitry Torokhov
2005-02-02 15:57         ` Vojtech Pavlik
2005-02-02 16:56       ` Pete Zaitcev
2005-02-02 17:07         ` Vojtech Pavlik
2005-02-02 17:58           ` Pete Zaitcev
2005-02-02 19:11             ` Vojtech Pavlik
2005-02-02 19:39               ` Pete Zaitcev
2005-02-02 19:55                 ` Vojtech Pavlik
2005-02-02 19:39             ` Dmitry Torokhov
2005-02-03  8:30             ` Alexandre Oliva
2005-02-03  8:49               ` Vojtech Pavlik
2005-02-03 15:17                 ` Alexandre Oliva
2005-02-03 15:28                   ` Dmitry Torokhov
2005-02-03 15:45                     ` Vojtech Pavlik
2005-02-02 20:57     ` Peter Osterlund
2005-02-02 21:17       ` Dmitry Torokhov
2005-02-02 21:47         ` Peter Osterlund
2005-02-02 22:06           ` Dmitry Torokhov
2005-02-02 22:27             ` Peter Osterlund
2005-02-03  7:16               ` Dmitry Torokhov
2005-02-02 21:37       ` David Ford
2005-02-02 22:11       ` Pete Zaitcev
2005-02-02 22:58         ` Peter Osterlund
2005-02-03  6:46           ` Vojtech Pavlik [this message]
2005-02-03 21:54             ` Peter Osterlund
2005-02-04  6:17               ` Vojtech Pavlik
2005-02-04  6:40                 ` Peter Osterlund
2005-02-04  6:53                   ` Vojtech Pavlik
2005-02-04  7:33                     ` Peter Osterlund
2005-02-04 13:25                   ` Vojtech Pavlik
2005-02-04 13:23               ` Vojtech Pavlik
2005-02-03  6:59           ` Pete Zaitcev
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-01-25 19:55 David Brownell
2005-01-25 21:30 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2005-01-30 11:20   ` Peter Osterlund
2005-01-30 20:59     ` David Brownell
2005-01-31 21:46   ` Pete Zaitcev
2005-01-31 22:00     ` Dmitry Torokhov
2005-02-08 10:55 Stephane Raimbault
2005-02-08 17:05 ` Peter Osterlund
2005-02-09  8:47   ` Stephane Raimbault
2005-02-09 18:09     ` Peter Osterlund
2005-02-10  8:32       ` Stephane Raimbault

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20050203064645.GA2342@ucw.cz \
    --to=vojtech@suse.cz \
    --cc=dtor_core@ameritech.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=petero2@telia.com \
    --cc=zaitcev@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox