From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+willy=40w.ods.org-S261243AbVBFOXQ@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S261243AbVBFOXQ (ORCPT <rfc822;willy@w.ods.org>);
	Sun, 6 Feb 2005 09:23:16 -0500
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261245AbVBFOXQ
	(ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing>);
	Sun, 6 Feb 2005 09:23:16 -0500
Received: from mx1.elte.hu ([157.181.1.137]:29417 "EHLO mx1.elte.hu")
	by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261243AbVBFOXN (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Sun, 6 Feb 2005 09:23:13 -0500
Date: Sun, 6 Feb 2005 15:22:54 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
       Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>, akpm@osdl.org,
       torvalds@osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, drepper@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL/PATCH] Remove PT_GNU_STACK support before 2.6.11
Message-ID: <20050206142254.GA7902@elte.hu>
References: <20050206120244.GA28061@elte.hu> <20050206124523.GA762@elte.hu> <20050206125002.GF30109@wotan.suse.de> <1107694800.22680.90.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> <20050206130152.GH30109@wotan.suse.de> <20050206130650.GA32015@infradead.org> <20050206131130.GJ30109@wotan.suse.de> <20050206133239.GA4483@elte.hu> <20050206134640.GB30476@wotan.suse.de> <20050206140802.GA6323@elte.hu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20050206140802.GA6323@elte.hu>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i
X-ELTE-SpamVersion: MailScanner 4.31.6-itk1 (ELTE 1.2) SpamAssassin 2.63 ClamAV 0.73
X-ELTE-VirusStatus: clean
X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no
X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=-4.9, required 5.9,
	autolearn=not spam, BAYES_00 -4.90
X-ELTE-SpamLevel: 
X-ELTE-SpamScore: -4
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org


* Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> wrote:

> > Last summer nobody did change the 32bit ABI on x86-64.
> > 
> > I only started it because the bug reports are appearing now and it's
> > clear now that we have a problem. 
> 
> the vanilla 2.6.10 x64 kernel, using 32-bit fedora userland boots fine
> here, and gives a noexec stack:

same with SuSE 9.1 32-bit user-space running a vanilla 2.6.10 x64 kernel
- PT_GNU_STACK is honored and the stack is noexec.

	Ingo