From: lm@bitmover.com (Larry McVoy)
To: Alexandre Oliva <aoliva@redhat.com>
Cc: Stelian Pop <stelian@popies.net>,
Francois Romieu <romieu@fr.zoreil.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] Linux Kernel Subversion Howto
Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2005 13:17:00 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050210211700.GA26361@bitmover.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <or7jlgpxio.fsf@livre.redhat.lsd.ic.unicamp.br>
Hi Alexandre,
It seems like you've made up your mind that we are operating out of pure
self interest and have no desire to help you or anyone else unless we
get something out of it. In other words, we're making our decisions
based on the net positive/negative effect on our business.
Is that a fair assessment of your position?
It's clear that the path we took has generated illwill amongst some of
you, the web is full of BK license is awful pages, etc. It's a matter
of the public record that we had at least some idea that this was going
to happen, we didn't expect that you'd all be happy with this arrangement.
So if we knew that doing this would hurt our business, which according
you is the only thing we care about, then why would we do it? The usual
response is the marketing value we get out of it. Yes, we certainly do
get some positive marketing out of this. We also get a ton of negative
marketing, you are aware of that, right?
Is it your opinion that the postive marketing we get outweighs the
negative? That's possible, I don't think it's true, but lets suppose it
is. That's only part of the picture. The other part is that we are
taking a huge risk by giving away the product to very group that is most
motivated to copy it, and if a good enough copy existed it is unlikely
our business would success.
If you are willing to believe that we have good good enough management
here that we were aware of this, and we added up the illwill and the IP
risk and did it anyway. Why? Why would any business do something that
was obviously a poor business decision? Please don't take the cheap
shot and say we are idiots, the founder of your company has advised us
from day one as have others. We knew what we were doing.
Can you offer any plausible explanation other than a good faith desire
to help the open source community, albeit in a non-traditional way?
This is perhaps a hard concept to grasp but we are basically saying we're
willing to help everyone except the people who want to take our business
away. I would guess that over 99.999% of the open source in the world
has nothing to do with SCM. That's a lot of source that we can help.
You are saying we are an evil money grubbing corporation because we
don't want to give our technology to our competitors. Fair enough,
that's true, we don't. What you aren't admitting is that we have done
a lot of good for your community, we continue to provide the tools,
the support, the infrastructure, and we do it in spite of it not being
a very good business decision. If we get no credit in your mind for
all of that then I don't think we have any basis for further discussion.
--
---
Larry McVoy lm at bitmover.com http://www.bitkeeper.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-02-10 21:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 111+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-02-02 15:54 [RFC] Linux Kernel Subversion Howto Stelian Pop
2005-02-02 16:15 ` Lethalman
2005-02-02 16:37 ` Lethalman
2005-02-03 10:34 ` Stelian Pop
2005-02-02 21:47 ` Daniele Venzano
2005-02-03 10:45 ` Stelian Pop
2005-02-04 20:04 ` Daniele Venzano
2005-02-04 20:52 ` Olaf Dietsche
2005-02-09 5:19 ` Kevin Puetz
2005-02-09 8:58 ` Miles Bader
2005-02-09 13:44 ` David Roundy
2005-02-03 0:29 ` H. Peter Anvin
2005-02-03 10:24 ` Stelian Pop
[not found] ` <200502030028.j130SNU9004640@terminus.zytor.com>
2005-02-03 3:34 ` Larry McVoy
2005-02-03 16:45 ` H. Peter Anvin
2005-02-03 19:32 ` Stelian Pop
2005-02-03 20:20 ` Larry McVoy
2005-02-03 22:00 ` Stelian Pop
2005-02-03 22:28 ` Larry McVoy
2005-02-04 13:01 ` Stelian Pop
2005-02-04 16:06 ` Larry McVoy
2005-02-04 16:22 ` Roland Dreier
2005-02-04 21:53 ` Stelian Pop
2005-02-04 17:03 ` Stelian Pop
2005-02-04 18:39 ` Larry McVoy
2005-02-04 20:05 ` Stelian Pop
2005-02-04 20:11 ` Larry McVoy
2005-02-04 21:40 ` Stelian Pop
2005-02-04 23:31 ` Francois Romieu
2005-02-05 19:38 ` Stelian Pop
2005-02-05 23:38 ` Larry McVoy
2005-02-08 15:43 ` Stelian Pop
2005-02-08 15:58 ` Larry McVoy
2005-02-08 17:17 ` Roman Zippel
2005-02-08 18:16 ` Larry McVoy
2005-02-08 18:52 ` Roman Zippel
2005-02-09 0:07 ` Theodore Ts'o
2005-02-09 2:05 ` Roman Zippel
2005-02-09 2:24 ` Jon Smirl
2005-02-09 2:35 ` Roman Zippel
2005-02-09 2:39 ` Larry McVoy
2005-02-09 2:47 ` Roman Zippel
2005-02-09 3:40 ` Larry McVoy
[not found] ` <Pine.LNX.4.61.0502091128070.7836@localhost.localdomain>
2005-02-09 17:38 ` Jon Smirl
2005-02-09 18:24 ` Nicolas Pitre
2005-02-09 18:48 ` Jon Smirl
2005-02-09 23:31 ` Roman Zippel
2005-02-09 23:52 ` Jon Smirl
2005-02-09 23:22 ` Roman Zippel
2005-02-10 0:13 ` Larry McVoy
2005-02-10 19:34 ` d.c
2005-02-11 8:40 ` Stelian Pop
2005-02-09 2:40 ` Jon Smirl
2005-02-09 2:57 ` Roman Zippel
2005-02-09 3:03 ` Jon Smirl
2005-02-09 5:48 ` Gene Heskett
2005-02-09 9:05 ` Miles Bader
2005-02-09 7:06 ` Alexandre Oliva
2005-02-09 14:48 ` d.c
2005-02-09 15:51 ` Larry McVoy
2005-02-09 17:30 ` Nicolas Pitre
2005-02-09 17:44 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2005-02-10 5:44 ` Horst von Brand
2005-02-10 9:36 ` Alexandre Oliva
2005-02-10 21:17 ` Larry McVoy [this message]
2005-02-11 9:02 ` Stelian Pop
2005-02-11 15:30 ` Alexandre Oliva
2005-02-11 15:48 ` Larry McVoy
2005-02-11 16:18 ` Larry McVoy
2005-02-11 16:54 ` Alexandre Oliva
2005-02-11 16:13 ` Jon Smirl
2005-02-11 17:22 ` Alexandre Oliva
2005-02-11 20:00 ` Larry McVoy
[not found] ` <20050210222403.GA5920@thunk.org>
[not found] ` <or650z6syt.fsf@livre.redhat.lsd.ic.unicamp.br>
2005-02-11 15:53 ` Larry McVoy
2005-02-11 17:24 ` Alexandre Oliva
2005-02-10 5:47 ` James Bruce
2005-02-06 16:40 ` Roman Zippel
2005-02-06 17:39 ` Larry McVoy
2005-02-07 1:45 ` Roman Zippel
2005-02-07 2:10 ` Larry McVoy
2005-02-08 14:57 ` Roman Zippel
2005-02-08 15:19 ` Larry McVoy
2005-02-08 15:24 ` Stelian Pop
2005-02-08 15:47 ` Larry McVoy
2005-02-08 15:36 ` Catalin Marinas
2005-02-08 15:58 ` Jon Smirl
2005-02-08 16:15 ` Roman Zippel
2005-02-08 17:17 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2005-02-08 17:23 ` Roman Zippel
2005-02-08 17:01 ` Larry McVoy
2005-02-07 2:16 ` Al Viro
2005-02-04 10:18 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2005-02-04 10:59 ` Stelian Pop
2005-02-04 11:08 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2005-02-04 11:20 ` Stelian Pop
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-02-09 18:46 Larry McVoy
2005-02-09 20:13 ` Nicolas Pitre
2005-02-09 23:53 ` Larry McVoy
2005-02-10 0:14 ` Roman Zippel
2005-02-10 0:50 ` Larry McVoy
2005-02-10 9:52 ` Roman Zippel
2005-02-10 10:11 ` linux
2005-02-10 6:08 ` James Bruce
2005-02-10 15:14 ` Stelian Pop
2005-02-10 16:42 Steve Lee
2005-02-10 19:23 ` Vojtech Pavlik
2005-02-10 19:50 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2005-02-11 18:56 none given
2005-02-11 19:50 ` Larry McVoy
[not found] <fa.hd724f5.h36q2j@ifi.uio.no>
2011-08-18 19:08 ` lucasrangit
2011-08-18 19:22 ` Randy Dunlap
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050210211700.GA26361@bitmover.com \
--to=lm@bitmover.com \
--cc=aoliva@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=romieu@fr.zoreil.com \
--cc=stelian@popies.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox