From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262235AbVBKKOi (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Feb 2005 05:14:38 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262236AbVBKKOi (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Feb 2005 05:14:38 -0500 Received: from fw.osdl.org ([65.172.181.6]:1678 "EHLO mail.osdl.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262235AbVBKKOe (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Feb 2005 05:14:34 -0500 Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2005 02:14:28 -0800 From: Andrew Morton To: Junfeng Yang Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mc@cs.Stanford.EDU Subject: Re: [CHECKER] Does sys_sync (ext2, 2.6.x) flush metadata? Message-Id: <20050211021428.59dc2234.akpm@osdl.org> In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.7 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-redhat-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Junfeng Yang wrote: > > > Hi, > > We're working on a file system checker and have a question regarding what > sys_sync actually does. It appears to us that sys_sync should sync both > data and metadata, and wait until both data and metadata hit the disk > before it returns. Is this true for all the file systems (especially > ext2) for kernel 2.6.x? It should be. > I've gotten many "error" traces for ext2, where > directory entries are not flushed to disk after sys_sync. How? > In other words, > even if users do call sys_sync, a crash after sys_sync call can still > cause file losses. Is this intended? No.