From: Frank van Maarseveen <frankvm@frankvm.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: repost: 2.6.11-rc4 BUG: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible [00000001] code: ip/6840
Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2005 20:30:37 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050213193037.GA2802@janus> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050206195111.GA28814@janus>
On Sun, Feb 06, 2005 at 08:51:11PM +0100, Frank van Maarseveen wrote:
> While executing
> iptables -t nat -D OUTPUT -d 80.126.170.174 -p tcp --dport https -j DNAT --to 192.168.0.1
> iptables -t nat -D OUTPUT -d 80.126.170.174 -p tcp --dport http -j DNAT --to 192.168.0.1
still present in -rc4:
kernel: BUG: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible [00000001] code: ip/6351
kernel: caller is get_next_corpse+0x13/0x260
kernel: [<c010385e>] dump_stack+0x1e/0x30
kernel: [<c024f60f>] smp_processor_id+0xaf/0xc0
kernel: [<c0408c03>] get_next_corpse+0x13/0x260
kernel: [<c0408e86>] ip_ct_iterate_cleanup+0x36/0xc0
kernel: [<c041981a>] masq_inet_event+0x3a/0x70
kernel: [<c012ee4d>] notifier_call_chain+0x2d/0x50
kernel: [<c03f02d9>] inet_del_ifa+0x99/0x150
kernel: [<c03f084b>] inet_rtm_deladdr+0x12b/0x170
kernel: [<c03b290b>] rtnetlink_rcv+0x35b/0x420
kernel: [<c03c26c0>] netlink_data_ready+0x60/0x70
kernel: [<c03c1ad1>] netlink_sendskb+0x31/0x60
kernel: [<c03c2391>] netlink_sendmsg+0x261/0x320
kernel: [<c039f16b>] sock_sendmsg+0xbb/0xe0
kernel: [<c03a0d14>] sys_sendmsg+0x1c4/0x230
kernel: [<c03a11bc>] sys_socketcall+0x21c/0x240
kernel: [<c01029f3>] syscall_call+0x7/0xb
kernel: BUG: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible [00000001] code: ip/6351
kernel: caller is get_next_corpse+0x23f/0x260
kernel: [<c010385e>] dump_stack+0x1e/0x30
kernel: [<c024f60f>] smp_processor_id+0xaf/0xc0
kernel: [<c0408e2f>] get_next_corpse+0x23f/0x260
kernel: [<c0408e86>] ip_ct_iterate_cleanup+0x36/0xc0
kernel: [<c041981a>] masq_inet_event+0x3a/0x70
kernel: [<c012ee4d>] notifier_call_chain+0x2d/0x50
kernel: [<c03f02d9>] inet_del_ifa+0x99/0x150
kernel: [<c03f084b>] inet_rtm_deladdr+0x12b/0x170
kernel: [<c03b290b>] rtnetlink_rcv+0x35b/0x420
kernel: [<c03c26c0>] netlink_data_ready+0x60/0x70
kernel: [<c03c1ad1>] netlink_sendskb+0x31/0x60
kernel: [<c03c2391>] netlink_sendmsg+0x261/0x320
kernel: [<c039f16b>] sock_sendmsg+0xbb/0xe0
kernel: [<c03a0d14>] sys_sendmsg+0x1c4/0x230
kernel: [<c03a11bc>] sys_socketcall+0x21c/0x240
kernel: [<c01029f3>] syscall_call+0x7/0xb
--
Frank
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-02-13 19:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-02-06 19:51 2.6.11-rc3 BUG: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible [00000001] code: ip/6840 Frank van Maarseveen
2005-02-06 20:05 ` Matthias-Christian Ott
2005-02-13 19:30 ` Frank van Maarseveen [this message]
2005-02-14 14:03 ` repost: 2.6.11-rc4 " Matthias-Christian Ott
2005-02-14 14:18 ` Frank van Maarseveen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050213193037.GA2802@janus \
--to=frankvm@frankvm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox