Re: [BK] upgrade will be needed

Jeff Sipek
2005-02-14T15:08:29Z

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 909 bytes --]

On Mon, Feb 14, 2005 at 01:08:58PM +0100, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> On Sun, 13 Feb 2005 18:08:02 -0800, Larry McVoy <lm@bitmover.com> wrote:
> > is to clarify the non-compete stuff. We've had some people who have
> > indicated that they believed that if they used BK they were agreeing
> > that they would never work on another SCM system. We can see how it
> > is possible that people would interpret the license that way but that
> > wasn't our intent. What we would like to do is change the language to
> > say that if you use BK you are agreeing that you won't work on another
> > SCM for 1 year after you stop using BK. But after that you would be
>
> I don't even plan working on some SCM system, but being
> tainted for 1 year for just *using* BK is not worth the price IMHO.

I agree, the price is just too high. No matter how much I like BK, I
would give it up.

Jeff.

[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]