public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nathan Lynch <ntl@pobox.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Cc: Zwane Mwaikambo <zwane@arm.linux.org.uk>,
	lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Subject: [PATCH] kthread_bind new worker threads when onlining cpu
Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2005 20:06:28 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050216020628.GA25596@otto> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050215070217.GB13568@elte.hu>

Hi Andrew-

On Tue, Feb 15, 2005 at 08:02:17AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> 
> * Nathan Lynch <ntl@pobox.com> wrote:
> 
> > 
> > It looks as if we need to explicitly bind worker threads to a newly
> > onlined cpu.  This gets rid of the smp_processor_id warnings from
> > cache_reap.  Adding a little more instrumentation to the debug
> > smp_processor_id showed that new worker threads were actually running
> > on the wrong cpu...
> > 
> > Does this look ok?
> 
> indeed - looks much better than the 'turn off the warning' solution.
> 
> Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>

We weren't binding new worker threads to their cpu when onlining.
Using preempt and the debug version of smp_processor_id found this.

Signed-off-by: Nathan Lynch <ntl@pobox.com>

Index: linux-2.6.11-rc4-bk2/kernel/workqueue.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.11-rc4-bk2.orig/kernel/workqueue.c	2005-02-14 11:13:08.000000000 -0600
+++ linux-2.6.11-rc4-bk2/kernel/workqueue.c	2005-02-14 15:18:35.000000000 -0600
@@ -485,8 +485,10 @@
 
 	case CPU_ONLINE:
 		/* Kick off worker threads. */
-		list_for_each_entry(wq, &workqueues, list)
+		list_for_each_entry(wq, &workqueues, list) {
+			kthread_bind(wq->cpu_wq[hotcpu].thread, hotcpu);
 			wake_up_process(wq->cpu_wq[hotcpu].thread);
+		}
 		break;
 
 	case CPU_UP_CANCELED:

  reply	other threads:[~2005-02-16  2:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-02-11 23:28 2.6-bk: cpu hotplug + preempt = smp_processor_id warnings galore Nathan Lynch
2005-02-11 23:56 ` Matthias-Christian Ott
2005-02-12  0:56   ` Nathan Lynch
2005-02-12 18:59 ` Zwane Mwaikambo
2005-02-14 21:59   ` Nathan Lynch
2005-02-15  7:02     ` Ingo Molnar
2005-02-16  2:06       ` Nathan Lynch [this message]
2005-02-16  5:31         ` [PATCH] Run softirqs on proper processor on offline Zwane Mwaikambo
2005-02-16  5:34           ` Ingo Molnar
2005-02-16  5:51           ` Andrew Morton
2005-02-16  6:17             ` Zwane Mwaikambo
2005-02-15 15:29     ` 2.6-bk: cpu hotplug + preempt = smp_processor_id warnings galore Zwane Mwaikambo
2005-02-15 17:26       ` Nathan Lynch

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20050216020628.GA25596@otto \
    --to=ntl@pobox.com \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
    --cc=zwane@arm.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox