From: Bernard Blackham <bernard@blackham.com.au>
To: Pavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz>
Cc: dtor_core@ameritech.net, John M Flinchbaugh <john@hjsoft.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Swsusp, resume and kernel versions
Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2005 10:02:20 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050218020220.GD30342@blackham.com.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050217195651.GB5963@openzaurus.ucw.cz>
On Thu, Feb 17, 2005 at 08:56:52PM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > > Just remember you're doing the mkswap if you decide to rearrange your
> > > partitions at all, or code a script smart enough to grep your swap
> > > partitions out of your fstab.
> >
> > It could be a workaround. Still it will cause loss of unsaved work if
> > I happen to load wrong kernel. Given that the code checking for swsusp
> > image can be marked __init I don't understand the reasons gainst doing
> > it.
>
> How do you know which partitions to check? swsusp gets it from resume= parameter,
> but if you do not have it compiled, you probably have wrong cmdline, too.
In many cases, you might have added the resume= line to every kernel
that's booted (eg, LILO's global append= parameter, or Debian GRUB's
magic kopts gear). Alternately (or additionally), you could examine
the signature when sys_swapon is called on a swap partition (though
the code couldn't be __init then).
These together I want to claim would catch many of these cases, and
any effort to avoid severe filesystem corruption is a good thing.
Bernard.
--
Bernard Blackham <bernard at blackham dot com dot au>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-02-18 2:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-02-17 4:46 Swsusp, resume and kernel versions Dmitry Torokhov
2005-02-17 5:15 ` Nigel Cunningham
2005-02-17 5:38 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2005-02-17 8:09 ` Nigel Cunningham
2005-02-17 21:05 ` Stefan Seyfried
2005-02-18 10:34 ` Nigel Cunningham
2005-02-18 11:23 ` Stefan Seyfried
2005-02-17 11:07 ` Pavel Machek
2005-02-17 16:28 ` John M Flinchbaugh
2005-02-17 17:30 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2005-02-17 19:56 ` Pavel Machek
2005-02-17 20:09 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2005-02-18 2:02 ` Bernard Blackham [this message]
2005-02-18 11:24 ` Pavel Machek
2005-02-18 12:26 ` Bernard Blackham
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050218020220.GD30342@blackham.com.au \
--to=bernard@blackham.com.au \
--cc=dtor_core@ameritech.net \
--cc=john@hjsoft.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pavel@suse.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox