Re: [rsbac] Thoughts on the "No Linux Security Modules framework" old claims

Casey Schaufler
2005-02-22T15:23:30Z

[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii, Size: 893 bytes --]

--- Amon Ott <ao@rsbac.org> wrote:

> On Montag 21 Februar 2005 18:50, Casey Schaufler
> wrote:
> >
> > --- Lorenzo Hernández García-Hierro
> <lorenzo@gnu.org>
> > wrote:
> >
> >
> > > > There are cases where Linux DAC and MAC cannot
> > > live happily together,
> > > > because Linux DAC is too limited.
> > >
> > > Agreed.
> >
> > OKay, I'll bite. MAC and DAC are seperate.
> > How is it that (the limited nature of) the DAC
> > behavior makes a system with both unhappy?
>
> Back in 2001/2002 (versions 1.1.2 and 1.2.0), I
> added DAC disabling
> support first for the full filesystem ...

There's way to much context missing for
me to make heads or tails of what the issue
was!

=====
Casey Schaufler
casey@schaufler-ca.com

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around