Re: Thoughts on the "No Linux Security Modules framework" old claims

Lorenzo Hernández García-Hierro
2005-02-23T22:36:45Z

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 940 bytes --]

El mié, 23-02-2005 a las 14:07 -0800, Crispin Cowan escribió:
> If that is what you meant, then we had no issue.
>
> It looked like you were referring to Immunix because, in the quoted
> text, one paragraph only discussed Immunix (by name) and then the
> subsequent paragraph just said "them" and then talked about patents.
> There was no mention of SCC.
>
> So even if you meant SCC, the casual reader only saw "Immunix" followed
> by "patents", and would infer the obvious.

Yes, my fault.
I hope this will let readers out of any possible confusion, again, sorry
for any inconveniences, wasn't my intention to create confusion around
Immunix.

At least from my side, I don't have fights nor bad relationships with
anybody from Immunix, but also I just know a very few people from there.

Cheers,
--
Lorenzo Hernández García-Hierro <lorenzo@gnu.org>
[1024D/6F2B2DEC] & [2048g/9AE91A22][http://tuxedo-es.org]

[-- Attachment #2: Esta parte del mensaje está firmada digitalmente --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]