public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: folkert@vanheusden.com (Folkert van Heusden)
To: Bill Davidsen <davidsen@tmr.com>
Cc: Rog?rio Brito <rbrito@ime.usp.br>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.6.11rc4: irq 5, nobody cared
Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2005 17:44:15 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050224164407.GC5138@vanheusden.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <421CF352.2090200@tmr.com>

> >>My linux laptop says:
> >>irq 5: nobody cared!
> >(...)
> >>Does anyone care? :-)
> >Well, I'm getting similar stack traces with my system and those are sure
> >scary, but it seems that my e-mails to the list are simply ignored,
> >unfortunately.
> I posted a similar thing, but the problem is not that you get the 
> message. It means your hardware generated an unexpected interrupt. The 
> kernel is reporting that fact as it should.
> The problem I had (not resolved) is that after the message
>   DISABLING IRQ NN
> I continued to get interrupts! So the logic to disable the IRQ is not 
> working correctly.

In my case, the interrupt should NOT be disabled as my WIFI-interface is
behind it (via ndiswrappers).

> as you note, because the hardware is generating the condition, no one 
> seems to care, even though there clearly is a problem in the disable 
> logic. I found a way to fix my hardware thanks to some pointers I got, 
> so I'm running, but I haven't heard that the base problem is fixed.

Aight.


Folkert van Heusden

Op zoek naar een IT of Finance baan? Mail me voor de mogelijkheden!
+------------------------------------------------------------------+
|UNIX admin? Then give MultiTail (http://vanheusden.com/multitail/)|
|a try, it brings monitoring logfiles to a different level! See    |
|http://vanheusden.com/multitail/features.html for a feature list. |
+------------------------------------------= www.unixsoftware.nl =-+
Phone: +31-6-41278122, PGP-key: 1F28D8AE

  reply	other threads:[~2005-02-24 16:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-02-20 15:56 2.6.11rc4: irq 5, nobody cared Folkert van Heusden
2005-02-20 16:40 ` Rogério Brito
2005-02-20 17:19   ` Matthias-Christian Ott
2005-02-20 18:05     ` Rogério Brito
2005-02-20 20:00       ` Matthias-Christian Ott
2005-02-21 18:43       ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2005-02-21 18:50         ` Jeff Garzik
2005-02-21 19:42           ` Wichert Akkerman
2005-02-21 20:32             ` Jeff Garzik
2005-02-21 21:48               ` Wichert Akkerman
2005-02-23 21:41             ` Bill Davidsen
2005-02-21 19:02         ` Rogério Brito
2005-02-23 21:19   ` Bill Davidsen
2005-02-24 16:44     ` Folkert van Heusden [this message]
2005-02-24 21:37       ` Bill Davidsen
2005-02-20 16:43 ` Arjan van de Ven

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20050224164407.GC5138@vanheusden.com \
    --to=folkert@vanheusden.com \
    --cc=davidsen@tmr.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rbrito@ime.usp.br \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox