From: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
To: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [2.6 patch] unexport do_settimeofday
Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2005 15:20:09 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050225152009.14cdf450.akpm@osdl.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050225230246.GI3311@stusta.de>
Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de> wrote:
>
> > +#ifdef MODULE
> > +#define __deprecated_in_modules __deprecated
> > +#else
> > +#define __deprecated_in_modules /* OK in non-modular code */
> > +#endif
> > +
> >...
>
> Looks good.
>
>
> One more question:
>
> You get a false positive if the file containing the symbol is itself a
> module.
I don't understand what you mean.
You mean that a module is doing an EXPORT_SYMBOL of a symbol which is on
death row?
If so: err, not sure. I guess we could just live with the warning.
> Is there any way to solve this without additional #define's and #ifdef's
> for each symbol?
Not that I can think of.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-02-25 23:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-02-24 23:37 [2.6 patch] unexport do_settimeofday Adrian Bunk
2005-02-25 5:24 ` Andrew Morton
2005-02-25 8:02 ` Arjan van de Ven
2005-02-25 8:28 ` Andrew Morton
2005-02-25 8:47 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2005-02-25 9:26 ` Andreas Dilger
2005-02-25 9:33 ` Arjan van de Ven
2005-02-25 9:46 ` Andrew Morton
2005-02-27 22:44 ` Christoph Hellwig
2005-02-25 21:43 ` Adrian Bunk
2005-02-25 21:55 ` Andrew Morton
2005-02-25 23:02 ` Adrian Bunk
2005-02-25 23:20 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2005-02-26 10:01 ` Arjan van de Ven
2005-02-26 15:28 ` Adrian Bunk
2005-02-26 15:22 ` Adrian Bunk
2005-02-26 13:33 ` [2.6 patch] deprecate EXPORT_SYMBOL(do_settimeofday) Adrian Bunk
2005-02-26 13:37 ` YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明
2005-02-26 13:38 ` YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明
2005-02-26 14:46 ` Russell King
2005-02-26 16:23 ` Adrian Bunk
2005-02-26 16:46 ` Russell King
2005-02-26 17:13 ` Adrian Bunk
2005-02-26 17:20 ` Russell King
2005-02-27 0:28 ` Adrian Bunk
2005-02-26 17:29 ` Russell King
2005-02-27 0:43 ` Adrian Bunk
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050225152009.14cdf450.akpm@osdl.org \
--to=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=bunk@stusta.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox