From: Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@vrfy.org>
To: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: split kobject creation and hotplug event generation
Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2005 21:24:43 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050228202443.GA25248@vrfy.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050228194642.GA21323@kroah.com>
On Mon, Feb 28, 2005 at 11:46:42AM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 26, 2005 at 06:53:16AM +0100, Kay Sievers wrote:
> > This splits the implicit generation of a hotplug events from
> > kobject_add() and kobject_del(), to give the user of of these
> > functions control over the time the event is created.
> >
> > The kobject_register() and unregister functions still have the same
> > behavior and emit the events by themselves.
> >
> > The class, block and device core is changed now to emit the hotplug
> > event _after_ the "dev" file, the "device" symlink and the default
> > attributes are created. This will save udev from spinning in a stat() loop
> > to wait for the files to appear, which is expensive if we have a lot of
> > concurrent events.
>
> So, does this solve the issue that everyone has been complaining about
> for years with the hotplug event happening before the sysfs files are
> present?
I expect most of them, yes. It is not a guarantee, cause drivers can and will
create attributes at any time. :) But the most interesting default ones, that
people tend to expect at event time will be there _before_ the event happens.
To get this for the whole system and not only the class+block core, a few remainig
places that use kobject_register() need to be changed to use kobject_add(), but
that is a trivial change and nice too, cause it cleans up some error pathes, where
a device needs to be unregistered in the same function and it emits two completely
useless events for that.
> And if we add this, can we pretty much get rid of all of the
> wait_for_sysfs like logic in udev?
Yes, that was the motivation to do this. With all the hotplug env vars
we have now, we can throw out all the compiled-in lists and if some crazy
devices still need to wait, we can add something to udev's rule logic, that a
configured rule will wait for that file to show up.
Thanks,
Kay
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-02-28 20:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-02-26 5:53 split kobject creation and hotplug event generation Kay Sievers
2005-02-26 6:03 ` Kay Sievers
2005-02-28 19:46 ` Greg KH
2005-02-28 20:24 ` Kay Sievers [this message]
2005-03-01 7:56 ` Greg KH
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050228202443.GA25248@vrfy.org \
--to=kay.sievers@vrfy.org \
--cc=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox